Large Language Model Versus Manual Review for Clinical Data Curation in Breast Cancer: Retrospective Comparative Study

LLM-based curation of automatically extracted, deidentified clinical data demonstrated comparable effectiveness to manual physician review while reducing processing time by 95% and physician hours by 91%. This 2-step approach-automated data extraction followed by LLM curation-addresses both privacy concerns and efficiency needs. Despite limitations in integrating multiple clinical events, this methodology offers a scalable solution for clinical data extraction in oncology research. The 90.8% accuracy rate and superior capture of survival events suggest that combining automated data extraction systems with LLM processing can accelerate retrospective clinical research while maintaining data quality and patient privacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JMIR Medical Informatics
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/73605
Citations
2
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Large Language Model Versus Manual Review for Clinical Data Curation in Breast Cancer: Retrospective Comparative Study

Chang Ik Yoon, Jiyoung Rhu, Jong Min Baek, Hocheol Lee et al.
2 citations
JMIR Medical Informatics
AI in cancer detection
4.96
article

Large Language Model Versus Manual Review for Clinical Data Curation in Breast Cancer: Retrospective Comparative Study

Chang Ik Yoon, Jiyoung Rhu, Jong Min Baek, Hocheol Lee, H.S. Kim, Young-Joon Kang, Ye Won Jeon, Yong‐Seok Kim, Hoon Choi, Jae Pak Yi, Sueng-Bum Lim
article en
2 citations

Abstract

LLM-based curation of automatically extracted, deidentified clinical data demonstrated comparable effectiveness to manual physician review while reducing processing time by 95% and physician hours by 91%. This 2-step approach-automated data extraction followed by LLM curation-addresses both privacy concerns and efficiency needs. Despite limitations in integrating multiple clinical events, this methodology offers a scalable solution for clinical data extraction in oncology research. The 90.8% accuracy rate and superior capture of survival events suggest that combining automated data extraction systems with LLM processing can accelerate retrospective clinical research while maintaining data quality and patient privacy.

JMIR Medical InformaticsVol. 13
Yonsei University (KR), St. Mary's Hospital (US), The Catholic University of Korea St. Vincent's Hospital (KR), The Catholic University of Korea Incheon St. Mary's Hospital (KR), The Catholic University of Korea Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital (KR), The Catholic University of Korea Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital (KR), The Catholic University of Korea Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital (KR), The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
AI in cancer detection
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.