Political stability, geopolitical risks, and bank stability

• This study introduces the concept of foundational risks in banking stability analysis • The Political stability and geopolitical risks exert asymmetric effects on bank soundness • Foundational risks amplify fragility among vulnerable banks without systemic collapse • The findings offer guidance for targeted resilience strategies in developing economies Banking fragility in developing countries often stems from political instability and geopolitical risks. Referring collectively to both risks as foundational risks, this paper examines the impact of these risks on bank stability in developing countries. We employ panel quantile regressions and uncover that foundational risks exert asymmetric effects across the distribution of bank soundness. An increase in political stability and a reduction in geopolitical risks significantly strengthen banks’ resilience, particularly among the most vulnerable banks. Moreover, a rise in foundational risks intensifies fragility without triggering systemic collapse. These findings offer a fresh perspective for regulators seeking targeted resilience strategies in uncertain political and geopolitical landscapes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Finance research letters
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.108889
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Political stability, geopolitical risks, and bank stability

Mert Topçu, Ufuk Can
Finance research letters
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
article

Political stability, geopolitical risks, and bank stability

Mert Topçu, Ufuk Can
article en

Abstract

• This study introduces the concept of foundational risks in banking stability analysis • The Political stability and geopolitical risks exert asymmetric effects on bank soundness • Foundational risks amplify fragility among vulnerable banks without systemic collapse • The findings offer guidance for targeted resilience strategies in developing economies Banking fragility in developing countries often stems from political instability and geopolitical risks. Referring collectively to both risks as foundational risks, this paper examines the impact of these risks on bank stability in developing countries. We employ panel quantile regressions and uncover that foundational risks exert asymmetric effects across the distribution of bank soundness. An increase in political stability and a reduction in geopolitical risks significantly strengthen banks’ resilience, particularly among the most vulnerable banks. Moreover, a rise in foundational risks intensifies fragility without triggering systemic collapse. These findings offer a fresh perspective for regulators seeking targeted resilience strategies in uncertain political and geopolitical landscapes.

Finance research lettersVol. 86
Australian National University (AU), Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey (TR), Alanya University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Political stability, geopolitical risks, and bank stability — Mert Topçu, Ufuk Can · Finance research letters (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS