Political stability, geopolitical risks, and bank stability
• This study introduces the concept of foundational risks in banking stability analysis • The Political stability and geopolitical risks exert asymmetric effects on bank soundness • Foundational risks amplify fragility among vulnerable banks without systemic collapse • The findings offer guidance for targeted resilience strategies in developing economies Banking fragility in developing countries often stems from political instability and geopolitical risks. Referring collectively to both risks as foundational risks, this paper examines the impact of these risks on bank stability in developing countries. We employ panel quantile regressions and uncover that foundational risks exert asymmetric effects across the distribution of bank soundness. An increase in political stability and a reduction in geopolitical risks significantly strengthen banks’ resilience, particularly among the most vulnerable banks. Moreover, a rise in foundational risks intensifies fragility without triggering systemic collapse. These findings offer a fresh perspective for regulators seeking targeted resilience strategies in uncertain political and geopolitical landscapes.
Authors
- Mert Topçu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8236-9810)
- Ufuk Can (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5398-5769)
Institutions
- Australian National University (AU)
- Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey (TR)
- Alanya University (TR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Finance research letters
- Published
- 2025-11-06
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.108889
- Primary Topic
- Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00