Forms of understanding for XAI-Explanations

Explainability has become an important topic in computer science and artificial intelligence, leading to a subfield called Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). The goal of providing or seeking explanations is to achieve (better) ‘understanding’ on the part of the explainee. However, what it means to ‘understand’ is still not clearly defined, and the concept itself is rarely the subject of scientific investigation. This conceptual article aims to present a model of forms of understanding for XAI-explanations and beyond. From an interdisciplinary perspective bringing together computer science, linguistics, sociology, philosophy and psychology, a definition of understanding and its forms, assessment, and dynamics during the process of giving everyday explanations are explored. Two types of understanding are considered as possible outcomes of explanations, namely enabledness , ‘knowing how’ to do or decide something, and comprehension , ‘knowing that’ – both in different degrees (from shallow to deep). Explanations regularly start with shallow understanding in a specific domain and can lead to deep comprehension and enabledness of the explanandum, which we see as a prerequisite for human users to gain agency . In this process, the increase of comprehension and enabledness are highly interdependent. Against the background of this systematization, special challenges of understanding in XAI are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognitive Systems Research
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2025.101419
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forms of understanding for XAI-Explanations

André Groß, Josephine Fisher, Ingrid Scharlau, Friederike Kern et al.
7 citations
Cognitive Systems Research
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
17.37
article

Forms of understanding for XAI-Explanations

André Groß, Josephine Fisher, Ingrid Scharlau, Friederike Kern, Katharina J. Rohlfing, Helen Beierling, Ilona Horwath, Angela Grimminger, Anna-Lisa Vollmer, Michael Lenke, Lutz Terfloth, Nils Klowait, Heike M. Buhl, Hendrik Buschmeier, Britta Wrede, Vivien Lohmer, Annedore Wilmes, Stefan Lazarov, Amit Singh, Yu Wang
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Explainability has become an important topic in computer science and artificial intelligence, leading to a subfield called Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). The goal of providing or seeking explanations is to achieve (better) ‘understanding’ on the part of the explainee. However, what it means to ‘understand’ is still not clearly defined, and the concept itself is rarely the subject of scientific investigation. This conceptual article aims to present a model of forms of understanding for XAI-explanations and beyond. From an interdisciplinary perspective bringing together computer science, linguistics, sociology, philosophy and psychology, a definition of understanding and its forms, assessment, and dynamics during the process of giving everyday explanations are explored. Two types of understanding are considered as possible outcomes of explanations, namely enabledness , ‘knowing how’ to do or decide something, and comprehension , ‘knowing that’ – both in different degrees (from shallow to deep). Explanations regularly start with shallow understanding in a specific domain and can lead to deep comprehension and enabledness of the explanandum, which we see as a prerequisite for human users to gain agency . In this process, the increase of comprehension and enabledness are highly interdependent. Against the background of this systematization, special challenges of understanding in XAI are discussed.

Cognitive Systems ResearchVol. 94
Universität für Weiterbildung Krems (AT), Bielefeld University (DE), Paderborn University (DE), Constructing Excellence (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
17.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.