A novel PINN algorithm for a bridge weigh in motion system without prior knowledge of axle location

Bridge Weigh-in-Motion (BWIM) is an effective method of using instrumented bridges to find the weights of passing vehicles. Traditional BWIM systems rely on axle detectors to determine axle locations/spacings, which are used to formulate the system of equations and calculate axle loads. However, commonly used Free of Axle Detector (FAD) systems exhibit reduced accuracy when vehicle speeds are high or when multiple vehicles cross the bridge simultaneously. Similarly, computer vision-based detectors are highly sensitive to environmental conditions (e.g. rain), which can degrade video quality and affect detection accuracy. Inaccurate axle location data introduces significant errors in vehicle load estimation. To address this challenge, this study proposes a novel BWIM system that does not require prior knowledge of vehicle locations. Since the relationship between vehicle axle information and bridge response is inherently non-linear, we introduce a Gaussian-based neural network layer as a function approximator to model this complex mapping. Furthermore, the physical principles governing time, location, axle spacing, axle loads, and bridge responses are embedded directly into the network structure, ensuring that the model predictions remain physically consistent. Once the network is trained, the error between theoretical and measured responses can be minimized to find axle loads from the neural network parameters, which correspond to the magnitudes of vehicle loads. Numerical results indicate that, for cases where two- and three-axle vehicles traverse different lanes simultaneously, the 99.9% confidence level error for GVW is 1.2%. Field test results further validate the approach, demonstrating that the 99.9% confidence interval error for GVW is 8.9%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2025.113564
Primary Topic
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A novel PINN algorithm for a bridge weigh in motion system without prior knowledge of axle location

Eugene J. OBrien, Longwei Zhang, Zhongyuan Chen, Xuan Kong et al.
Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
article

A novel PINN algorithm for a bridge weigh in motion system without prior knowledge of axle location

Eugene J. OBrien, Longwei Zhang, Zhongyuan Chen, Xuan Kong, Shuo Wang, Lu Deng, Dayong Han
article en

Abstract

Bridge Weigh-in-Motion (BWIM) is an effective method of using instrumented bridges to find the weights of passing vehicles. Traditional BWIM systems rely on axle detectors to determine axle locations/spacings, which are used to formulate the system of equations and calculate axle loads. However, commonly used Free of Axle Detector (FAD) systems exhibit reduced accuracy when vehicle speeds are high or when multiple vehicles cross the bridge simultaneously. Similarly, computer vision-based detectors are highly sensitive to environmental conditions (e.g. rain), which can degrade video quality and affect detection accuracy. Inaccurate axle location data introduces significant errors in vehicle load estimation. To address this challenge, this study proposes a novel BWIM system that does not require prior knowledge of vehicle locations. Since the relationship between vehicle axle information and bridge response is inherently non-linear, we introduce a Gaussian-based neural network layer as a function approximator to model this complex mapping. Furthermore, the physical principles governing time, location, axle spacing, axle loads, and bridge responses are embedded directly into the network structure, ensuring that the model predictions remain physically consistent. Once the network is trained, the error between theoretical and measured responses can be minimized to find axle loads from the neural network parameters, which correspond to the magnitudes of vehicle loads. Numerical results indicate that, for cases where two- and three-axle vehicles traverse different lanes simultaneously, the 99.9% confidence level error for GVW is 1.2%. Field test results further validate the approach, demonstrating that the 99.9% confidence interval error for GVW is 8.9%.

Mechanical Systems and Signal ProcessingVol. 241
University College Dublin (IE), Hunan University of Science and Technology (CN), Hunan University (CN), PowerChina (China) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.