Discrete Element Method contact force parameter impact for particle-level interactions in agitated mills

This work analyses the sensitivity of Discrete Element Method (DEM) simulations to contact model parameter values, considering both particle–particle and particle-geometry interactions, and the impact on system response for stirred mills. Determining the correct pairwise parameters in a DEM model remains a non-trivial undertaking. This difficulty is in part due to complex relationships between the parameters and system response; often the parameters themselves are correlated. Differing process regimes may also draw different levels of influence from the contact parameters, e.g. the coefficient of restitution may be deemed insignificant in friction-driven flows, but significant for other regimes. In this study, process settings (mill speed and mass fill) as well as contact model parameters are varied to infer the change in system response. A sensitivity analysis at three levels (empirical, component analysis on simplified derivatives, and considering full derivatives) is presented. It is found that the response of a fully packed system showed little variance with contact parameter values, especially when translational motion is the focus. Furthermore, particle-geometry terms have a greater impact than the particle–particle equivalents. Translational motion is dominated by the coefficient of restitution and rotational motion by the rolling friction coefficient. The corollary is that any parameter estimation should account for the anticipated process conditions, and thus a DEM study should consider sensitivity analysis as a key step of the parameter estimation process. This ensures that variance in contact models is better recognised by estimation methods, and thus provides better parameter estimation. • Densely packed mills show dependency on sliding friction. • Less packed mills show strong dependency on the coefficient of restitution. • Sensitivities vary across particle–particle and particle-geometry contacts. • The contact parameter dependency varies across different mill geometries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Powder Technology
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2025.121728
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Mineral Processing and Grinding
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discrete Element Method contact force parameter impact for particle-level interactions in agitated mills

Ramon Cabiscol, Daniel Weston, Darren Gobby, Kit Windows‐Yule
2 citations
Powder Technology
Mineral Processing and Grinding
1.43
article

Discrete Element Method contact force parameter impact for particle-level interactions in agitated mills

Ramon Cabiscol, Daniel Weston, Darren Gobby, Kit Windows‐Yule
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This work analyses the sensitivity of Discrete Element Method (DEM) simulations to contact model parameter values, considering both particle–particle and particle-geometry interactions, and the impact on system response for stirred mills. Determining the correct pairwise parameters in a DEM model remains a non-trivial undertaking. This difficulty is in part due to complex relationships between the parameters and system response; often the parameters themselves are correlated. Differing process regimes may also draw different levels of influence from the contact parameters, e.g. the coefficient of restitution may be deemed insignificant in friction-driven flows, but significant for other regimes. In this study, process settings (mill speed and mass fill) as well as contact model parameters are varied to infer the change in system response. A sensitivity analysis at three levels (empirical, component analysis on simplified derivatives, and considering full derivatives) is presented. It is found that the response of a fully packed system showed little variance with contact parameter values, especially when translational motion is the focus. Furthermore, particle-geometry terms have a greater impact than the particle–particle equivalents. Translational motion is dominated by the coefficient of restitution and rotational motion by the rolling friction coefficient. The corollary is that any parameter estimation should account for the anticipated process conditions, and thus a DEM study should consider sensitivity analysis as a key step of the parameter estimation process. This ensures that variance in contact models is better recognised by estimation methods, and thus provides better parameter estimation. • Densely packed mills show dependency on sliding friction. • Less packed mills show strong dependency on the coefficient of restitution. • Sensitivities vary across particle–particle and particle-geometry contacts. • The contact parameter dependency varies across different mill geometries.

Powder TechnologyVol. 469
Johnson Matthey (United Kingdom) (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Mineral Processing and Grinding
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.