Understanding patterns of hope from informal mentoring through latent class analysis

• Latent class analysis was used to understand patterns of hope in informal mentoring. • Mentee hope outcomes vary by generation, race-ethnicity, and primary language. • BIPOC, multilingual adults across generations reported more hope from their mentors • Younger, White, English-speaking adults reported less hope from their childhood mentors. Mentoring is associated with positive youth outcomes and functions as a safe, stable, nurturing relationship that can buffer against adversity and mental health challenges. Such relationships also promote hope, a key protective factor associated with reduced loneliness and enhanced wellbeing. Specifically, informal mentors have flexible, unstructured relationships that can help youth in different ways, depending on the circumstances of their relationship and mentees’ characteristics and preferences. Despite the recognized significance of informal mentoring relationships, little research has examined how and why mentees differ in the benefits they derive from these relationships. Thus, this study explored how hope from informal mentoring relationships varied among mentees. We used latent class analysis (LCA) to identify underlying characteristics of mentees and the extent to which hope is associated with membership in those classes. Data were drawn from the National Mentoring Partnership’s (MENTOR) nationally representative, cross-generational study ( N = 2,400), with current analyses limited to participants who reported having an informal mentor during childhood ( n = 935). Analyses revealed three classes–the Hopefuls, the Younger Less Hopefuls, and the Older Less Hopefuls–that were primarily distinguished by racially and ethnically marginalized identities and generation. The results suggest that mentees’ perceptions around how much informal mentors foster hope are heterogenous. Future research should further explore these differences in informal mentoring benefits to uncover the nuances within these relationships and how they can be used to support youth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Children and Youth Services Review
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108660
Primary Topic
Mentoring and Academic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding patterns of hope from informal mentoring through latent class analysis

Savannah B. Simpson, Samuel D. McQuillin, E. Scott Huebner, Bailey R. Dow
Children and Youth Services Review
Mentoring and Academic Development
article

Understanding patterns of hope from informal mentoring through latent class analysis

Savannah B. Simpson, Samuel D. McQuillin, E. Scott Huebner, Bailey R. Dow
article en

Abstract

• Latent class analysis was used to understand patterns of hope in informal mentoring. • Mentee hope outcomes vary by generation, race-ethnicity, and primary language. • BIPOC, multilingual adults across generations reported more hope from their mentors • Younger, White, English-speaking adults reported less hope from their childhood mentors. Mentoring is associated with positive youth outcomes and functions as a safe, stable, nurturing relationship that can buffer against adversity and mental health challenges. Such relationships also promote hope, a key protective factor associated with reduced loneliness and enhanced wellbeing. Specifically, informal mentors have flexible, unstructured relationships that can help youth in different ways, depending on the circumstances of their relationship and mentees’ characteristics and preferences. Despite the recognized significance of informal mentoring relationships, little research has examined how and why mentees differ in the benefits they derive from these relationships. Thus, this study explored how hope from informal mentoring relationships varied among mentees. We used latent class analysis (LCA) to identify underlying characteristics of mentees and the extent to which hope is associated with membership in those classes. Data were drawn from the National Mentoring Partnership’s (MENTOR) nationally representative, cross-generational study ( N = 2,400), with current analyses limited to participants who reported having an informal mentor during childhood ( n = 935). Analyses revealed three classes–the Hopefuls, the Younger Less Hopefuls, and the Older Less Hopefuls–that were primarily distinguished by racially and ethnically marginalized identities and generation. The results suggest that mentees’ perceptions around how much informal mentors foster hope are heterogenous. Future research should further explore these differences in informal mentoring benefits to uncover the nuances within these relationships and how they can be used to support youth.

Children and Youth Services ReviewVol. 180
University of South Carolina (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Mentoring and Academic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.