Tunnel ahead prospecting methods and intelligent interpretation of adverse geology: A review

Geological prospecting and the identification of adverse geological features are essential in tunnel construction, providing critical information to ensure safety and guide engineering decisions. As tunnel projects extend into deeper and more mountainous terrains, engineers face increasingly complex geological conditions, including high water pressure, intense geo-stress, elevated geothermal gradients, and active fault zones. These conditions pose substantial risks such as high-pressure water inrush, large-scale collapses, and tunnel boring machine (TBM) blockages. Addressing these challenges requires advanced detection technologies capable of long-distance, high-precision, and intelligent assessments of adverse geology. This paper presents a comprehensive review of recent advancements in tunnel geological ahead prospecting methods. It summarizes the fundamental principles, technical maturity, key challenges, development trends, and real-world applications of various detection techniques. Airborne and semi-airborne geophysical methods enable large-scale reconnaissance for initial surveys in complex terrain. Tunnel- and borehole-based approaches offer high-resolution detection during excavation, including seismic ahead prospecting (SAP), TBM rock-breaking source seismic methods, full-time-domain tunnel induced polarization (TIP), borehole electrical resistivity, and ground penetrating radar (GPR). To address scenarios involving multiple, coexisting adverse geologies, intelligent inversion and geological identification methods have been developed based on multi-source data fusion and artificial intelligence (AI) techniques. Overall, these advances significantly improve detection range, resolution, and geological characterization capabilities. The methods demonstrate strong adaptability to complex environments and provide reliable subsurface information, supporting safer and more efficient tunnel construction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2025.05.032
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Tunneling and Rock Mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tunnel ahead prospecting methods and intelligent interpretation of adverse geology: A review

Huaifeng Sun, Shucai Li, Lei Chen, Lichao Nie et al.
3 citations
Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
Tunneling and Rock Mechanics
2.86
article

Tunnel ahead prospecting methods and intelligent interpretation of adverse geology: A review

Huaifeng Sun, Shucai Li, Lei Chen, Lichao Nie, Bin Liu, Zhengyu Liu, R.C. Xiao
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Geological prospecting and the identification of adverse geological features are essential in tunnel construction, providing critical information to ensure safety and guide engineering decisions. As tunnel projects extend into deeper and more mountainous terrains, engineers face increasingly complex geological conditions, including high water pressure, intense geo-stress, elevated geothermal gradients, and active fault zones. These conditions pose substantial risks such as high-pressure water inrush, large-scale collapses, and tunnel boring machine (TBM) blockages. Addressing these challenges requires advanced detection technologies capable of long-distance, high-precision, and intelligent assessments of adverse geology. This paper presents a comprehensive review of recent advancements in tunnel geological ahead prospecting methods. It summarizes the fundamental principles, technical maturity, key challenges, development trends, and real-world applications of various detection techniques. Airborne and semi-airborne geophysical methods enable large-scale reconnaissance for initial surveys in complex terrain. Tunnel- and borehole-based approaches offer high-resolution detection during excavation, including seismic ahead prospecting (SAP), TBM rock-breaking source seismic methods, full-time-domain tunnel induced polarization (TIP), borehole electrical resistivity, and ground penetrating radar (GPR). To address scenarios involving multiple, coexisting adverse geologies, intelligent inversion and geological identification methods have been developed based on multi-source data fusion and artificial intelligence (AI) techniques. Overall, these advances significantly improve detection range, resolution, and geological characterization capabilities. The methods demonstrate strong adaptability to complex environments and provide reliable subsurface information, supporting safer and more efficient tunnel construction.

Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical EngineeringVol. 18(1)
Shandong University of Technology (CN), Shandong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Tunneling and Rock Mechanics
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.