Ethereum vs Solana: A Comparative Study of Blockchain Architecture on Performance, Security, and Ecosystem Development

Blockchain technology has emerged as a breakthrough in decentralized systems. The development of applications, systems, programs, and financial solutions can now be managed in a decentralized manner, revolutionizing the previously centralized paradigm. In this new system, performance, scalability, transaction costs, and network security present both challenges and compelling topics for research. This paper conducts a comparative analysis through experiments and evaluations of Ethereum and Solana, the two largest Layer 1 blockchain networks today. The comparison focuses on performance, consensus mechanisms, security, and ecosystem development. Performance is assessed through Transactions Per Second (TPS) and latency, while gas fees are compared under different network conditions. The study also analyzes Ethereum’s Proof-of-Stake (PoS) versus Solana’s Proof-of-History (PoH) + PoS consensus mechanisms. Network security is examined by reviewing historical vulnerabilities and corresponding responses. The DApp (Decentralized Application) ecosystem is evaluated based on Adoption Efficiency Index (AEI) and sector specialization (DeFi, NFT, gaming). Through this analysis, the paper aims to provide a deeper understanding of the differences, strengths, and weaknesses of both networks, helping developers choose the most suitable blockchain platform.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Procedia Computer Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.08.273
Primary Topic
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethereum vs Solana: A Comparative Study of Blockchain Architecture on Performance, Security, and Ecosystem Development

Reina Setiawan, Reinert Yosua Rumagit, Michael Wijaya, Franscelino Melvyn
Procedia Computer Science
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
article

Ethereum vs Solana: A Comparative Study of Blockchain Architecture on Performance, Security, and Ecosystem Development

Reina Setiawan, Reinert Yosua Rumagit, Michael Wijaya, Franscelino Melvyn
article en

Abstract

Blockchain technology has emerged as a breakthrough in decentralized systems. The development of applications, systems, programs, and financial solutions can now be managed in a decentralized manner, revolutionizing the previously centralized paradigm. In this new system, performance, scalability, transaction costs, and network security present both challenges and compelling topics for research. This paper conducts a comparative analysis through experiments and evaluations of Ethereum and Solana, the two largest Layer 1 blockchain networks today. The comparison focuses on performance, consensus mechanisms, security, and ecosystem development. Performance is assessed through Transactions Per Second (TPS) and latency, while gas fees are compared under different network conditions. The study also analyzes Ethereum’s Proof-of-Stake (PoS) versus Solana’s Proof-of-History (PoH) + PoS consensus mechanisms. Network security is examined by reviewing historical vulnerabilities and corresponding responses. The DApp (Decentralized Application) ecosystem is evaluated based on Adoption Efficiency Index (AEI) and sector specialization (DeFi, NFT, gaming). Through this analysis, the paper aims to provide a deeper understanding of the differences, strengths, and weaknesses of both networks, helping developers choose the most suitable blockchain platform.

Procedia Computer ScienceVol. 269
Binus University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.