Comparing LLMs and NMTs Performances in Translating English Indonesian Texts

As global communication increases, the demand for effective translation tools grows, particularly in countries with low English proficiency such as Indonesia. This study compares Neural Machine Translation (NMT) systems, Google Translate and DeepL, with Large Language Models (LLMs), ChatGPT and Gemini, in translating English–Indonesian and Indonesian–English texts. Using theFLORES-200 and BPPT-PANL corpora, we evaluated outputs with BLEU, chrF, and COMET metrics. While LLMs demonstrate contextual fluency and achieve a leading score in one of eight evaluation scenarios, NMT systems consistently outperform across the remaining cases in both corpora. These results affirm the current superiority of NMT systems in delivering reliable and structurally accurate translations, while LLMs show emerging potential in specific, context-heavy tasks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Procedia Computer Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.09.087
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing LLMs and NMTs Performances in Translating English Indonesian Texts

Rick Chow, Hidayaturrahman Hidayaturrahman, Almuzhidul Mujhid, Vellyn Angeline et al.
Procedia Computer Science
Natural Language Processing Techniques
article

Comparing LLMs and NMTs Performances in Translating English Indonesian Texts

Rick Chow, Hidayaturrahman Hidayaturrahman, Almuzhidul Mujhid, Vellyn Angeline, Gisella Jayata
article en

Abstract

As global communication increases, the demand for effective translation tools grows, particularly in countries with low English proficiency such as Indonesia. This study compares Neural Machine Translation (NMT) systems, Google Translate and DeepL, with Large Language Models (LLMs), ChatGPT and Gemini, in translating English–Indonesian and Indonesian–English texts. Using theFLORES-200 and BPPT-PANL corpora, we evaluated outputs with BLEU, chrF, and COMET metrics. While LLMs demonstrate contextual fluency and achieve a leading score in one of eight evaluation scenarios, NMT systems consistently outperform across the remaining cases in both corpora. These results affirm the current superiority of NMT systems in delivering reliable and structurally accurate translations, while LLMs show emerging potential in specific, context-heavy tasks.

Procedia Computer ScienceVol. 269
Binus University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.