The PEARL Score for Predicting Postoperative Complication Risk in Patients with Pelvic and Acetabular Fractures: Development of a Novel Comprehensive Risk Scoring System

<i>Background and Objectives:</i> The objective of this study was to construct and validate a novel, clinically practical risk-stratification score, PEARL (Pelvic and Acetabular Adverse-event Risk Level), integrating established preoperative and intraoperative predictors, to accurately estimate the likelihood of major postoperative complications in patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation for pelvic and/or acetabular fractures. <i>Materials and Methods</i><b><i>:</i></b> We retrospectively analyzed 200 adult patients treated surgically between January 2019 and January 2024 at two tertiary trauma centers. Demographic, injury-related, and perioperative data were collected. Major complications were defined as postoperative adverse events occurring within 30 days after surgery or during hospitalization, whereas delayed union and nonunion were evaluated as secondary long-term outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent risk factors, which were weighted to create the PEARL score (range: 0-6). Predictive performance was assessed using ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) analysis. We randomly split the sample into a 70% derivation and a 30% validation cohort. A multivariable LASSO-penalized logistic model identified independent predictors, which were weighted to construct the PEARL score. Discrimination (AUC) and calibration (Brier score, calibration curve) were assessed. <i>Results:</i> Major complications occurred in 29% of patients. Four independent predictors were identified: age ≥ 60 years, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, severe associated injury, and operative time ≥ 180 min. The score showed good discrimination (derivation AUC = 0.82) and acceptable external validation (validation AUC = 0.78), with Brier scores of 0.19 and 0.21, respectively. PEARL demonstrated good discriminative ability, AUC (Area Under the Curve) = 0.82. Complication rates increased across risk strata: low (7.5%), moderate (30%), and high risk (62%). <i>Conclusions:</i> The PEARL score is a simple, reliable tool to stratify the risk of major postoperative complications after pelvic and acetabular fracture surgery. Early identification of high-risk patients may facilitate targeted preventive strategies and improve outcomes. Further multicenter prospective validation is warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61111995
Primary Topic
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The PEARL Score for Predicting Postoperative Complication Risk in Patients with Pelvic and Acetabular Fractures: Development of a Novel Comprehensive Risk Scoring System

Fatih Emre Topsakal, Esra Demirel, Ekrem Özdemir, Nasuhi Altay
Medicina
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
article

The PEARL Score for Predicting Postoperative Complication Risk in Patients with Pelvic and Acetabular Fractures: Development of a Novel Comprehensive Risk Scoring System

Fatih Emre Topsakal, Esra Demirel, Ekrem Özdemir, Nasuhi Altay
article en

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives:</i> The objective of this study was to construct and validate a novel, clinically practical risk-stratification score, PEARL (Pelvic and Acetabular Adverse-event Risk Level), integrating established preoperative and intraoperative predictors, to accurately estimate the likelihood of major postoperative complications in patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation for pelvic and/or acetabular fractures. <i>Materials and Methods</i><b><i>:</i></b> We retrospectively analyzed 200 adult patients treated surgically between January 2019 and January 2024 at two tertiary trauma centers. Demographic, injury-related, and perioperative data were collected. Major complications were defined as postoperative adverse events occurring within 30 days after surgery or during hospitalization, whereas delayed union and nonunion were evaluated as secondary long-term outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent risk factors, which were weighted to create the PEARL score (range: 0-6). Predictive performance was assessed using ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) analysis. We randomly split the sample into a 70% derivation and a 30% validation cohort. A multivariable LASSO-penalized logistic model identified independent predictors, which were weighted to construct the PEARL score. Discrimination (AUC) and calibration (Brier score, calibration curve) were assessed. <i>Results:</i> Major complications occurred in 29% of patients. Four independent predictors were identified: age ≥ 60 years, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, severe associated injury, and operative time ≥ 180 min. The score showed good discrimination (derivation AUC = 0.82) and acceptable external validation (validation AUC = 0.78), with Brier scores of 0.19 and 0.21, respectively. PEARL demonstrated good discriminative ability, AUC (Area Under the Curve) = 0.82. Complication rates increased across risk strata: low (7.5%), moderate (30%), and high risk (62%). <i>Conclusions:</i> The PEARL score is a simple, reliable tool to stratify the risk of major postoperative complications after pelvic and acetabular fracture surgery. Early identification of high-risk patients may facilitate targeted preventive strategies and improve outcomes. Further multicenter prospective validation is warranted.

MedicinaVol. 61(11)
Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.