Predictive Model of Electrical Resistivity in Sandy, Silty and Clayey Soils Using Gravimetric Moisture Content

Soil electrical resistivity is a fundamental parameter in various geotechnical, agricultural, environmental, and engineering applications, as it directly depends on the soil’s moisture content and physical properties. Understanding this relationship is crucial for improving the safety and efficiency of electrical installations. This study analyzes the relationship between soil electrical resistivity and gravimetric moisture content in three soil types, sandy, clayey, and silty, with the aim of comparing the performance of different predictive models under controlled laboratory conditions. Seven fitting models were evaluated, Logarithmic Spline, Radial Basis Function (RBF), Locally Estimated Scatterplot Smoothing (LOESS), Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), Ridge Regression (RIDGE), Power Law and a segmented equation, using metrics such as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) and coefficient of determination R2 . The Spline and RBF models showed excellent accuracy and near-zero errors in all soils, although their applicability is limited by the lack of an explicit formulation and by the fact that, as interpolation methods, they do not guarantee predictive capacity outside the experimental dataset. Therefore, their use should be restricted to controlled laboratory conditions, as field variability factors can significantly alter soil resistivity responses. Among the explicit models, the Segmented Equation obtained a MAPE of 6.14% (sandy), 15.1% (clayey), and 13.16% (silty), with R2 values of 0.91, 0.93, and 0.89, respectively, demonstrating good performance and functionality. The Power Law model, although showing an R2 close to 0.96, presented significant overestimations, especially in silty soils (MAPE > 187%). The LASSO model yielded inconsistent predictions with percentage errors exceeding 120% in silty soils. In conclusion, nonparametric models provide excellent accuracy, while the segmented equation stands out as the best explicit alternative for estimating resistivity with reasonable precision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Eng—Advances in Engineering
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/eng6110317
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictive Model of Electrical Resistivity in Sandy, Silty and Clayey Soils Using Gravimetric Moisture Content

Saúl Antonio Obregón Biosca, Martínez Ángeles Hugo, Mario Trejo-Perea, Roberto Valentin Carrillo-Serrano et al.
1 citations
Eng—Advances in Engineering
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
0.95
article

Predictive Model of Electrical Resistivity in Sandy, Silty and Clayey Soils Using Gravimetric Moisture Content

Saúl Antonio Obregón Biosca, Martínez Ángeles Hugo, Mario Trejo-Perea, Roberto Valentin Carrillo-Serrano, José Gabriel Ríos-Moreno, Cesar Augusto Navarro Rubio
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Soil electrical resistivity is a fundamental parameter in various geotechnical, agricultural, environmental, and engineering applications, as it directly depends on the soil’s moisture content and physical properties. Understanding this relationship is crucial for improving the safety and efficiency of electrical installations. This study analyzes the relationship between soil electrical resistivity and gravimetric moisture content in three soil types, sandy, clayey, and silty, with the aim of comparing the performance of different predictive models under controlled laboratory conditions. Seven fitting models were evaluated, Logarithmic Spline, Radial Basis Function (RBF), Locally Estimated Scatterplot Smoothing (LOESS), Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), Ridge Regression (RIDGE), Power Law and a segmented equation, using metrics such as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) and coefficient of determination R2 . The Spline and RBF models showed excellent accuracy and near-zero errors in all soils, although their applicability is limited by the lack of an explicit formulation and by the fact that, as interpolation methods, they do not guarantee predictive capacity outside the experimental dataset. Therefore, their use should be restricted to controlled laboratory conditions, as field variability factors can significantly alter soil resistivity responses. Among the explicit models, the Segmented Equation obtained a MAPE of 6.14% (sandy), 15.1% (clayey), and 13.16% (silty), with R2 values of 0.91, 0.93, and 0.89, respectively, demonstrating good performance and functionality. The Power Law model, although showing an R2 close to 0.96, presented significant overestimations, especially in silty soils (MAPE > 187%). The LASSO model yielded inconsistent predictions with percentage errors exceeding 120% in silty soils. In conclusion, nonparametric models provide excellent accuracy, while the segmented equation stands out as the best explicit alternative for estimating resistivity with reasonable precision.

Eng—Advances in EngineeringVol. 6(11)
Autonomous University of Queretaro (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.