Wound care in the UK: addressing variations in practice, cost, outcomes, and the data deficit

Wound care presents a significant, yet often under-prioritised, challenge within the UK healthcare system. Despite affecting millions of patients and costing the NHS an estimated £8.3 billion annually (based on data primarily from England), wound management remains highly variable across regions, specialties, and care settings throughout the UK. This article explores the impact of inconsistent clinical practice, the economic implications of chronic and non-healing wounds, and the inequities experienced by patients, especially those with complex care needs. It also highlights the absence of a UK wound care database, which would enable the systemic and standardised monitoring of patient numbers, wound type prevalence, healing rates, and complications. A national wound care database would support quality assurance through the monitoring of outcomes, allow for benchmarking among healthcare providers as well as supporting the provision of robust data for research. Furthermore, it would strengthen healthcare policy, guideline development and support more efficient allocation of resources and commissioning across the four nations of the UK. This lack of coordinated data hinders meaningful research and service planning, quality improvement, equitable evidence-based care, and the opportunity to inform appropriate commissioning and targeted investment. Key strategies are proposed including the adoption of standardised pathways, investment in education, and the development of a UK-wide data infrastructure to support a more coordinated, evidence-based, and cost-effective approach to wound care in the UK.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Nursing
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2025.0428
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Wound Healing and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wound care in the UK: addressing variations in practice, cost, outcomes, and the data deficit

Louise Toner, Jackie Stephen‐Haynes
4 citations
British Journal of Nursing
Wound Healing and Treatments
4.10
article

Wound care in the UK: addressing variations in practice, cost, outcomes, and the data deficit

Louise Toner, Jackie Stephen‐Haynes
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Wound care presents a significant, yet often under-prioritised, challenge within the UK healthcare system. Despite affecting millions of patients and costing the NHS an estimated £8.3 billion annually (based on data primarily from England), wound management remains highly variable across regions, specialties, and care settings throughout the UK. This article explores the impact of inconsistent clinical practice, the economic implications of chronic and non-healing wounds, and the inequities experienced by patients, especially those with complex care needs. It also highlights the absence of a UK wound care database, which would enable the systemic and standardised monitoring of patient numbers, wound type prevalence, healing rates, and complications. A national wound care database would support quality assurance through the monitoring of outcomes, allow for benchmarking among healthcare providers as well as supporting the provision of robust data for research. Furthermore, it would strengthen healthcare policy, guideline development and support more efficient allocation of resources and commissioning across the four nations of the UK. This lack of coordinated data hinders meaningful research and service planning, quality improvement, equitable evidence-based care, and the opportunity to inform appropriate commissioning and targeted investment. Key strategies are proposed including the adoption of standardised pathways, investment in education, and the development of a UK-wide data infrastructure to support a more coordinated, evidence-based, and cost-effective approach to wound care in the UK.

British Journal of NursingVol. 34(20)
Birmingham City University (GB), The Edgbaston Hospital (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Wound Healing and Treatments
4.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.