Comparative Effectiveness of Origami-Box-Folding and Outside-the-Box Knot-Tying Exercises in Laparoscopic Surgical Training: A Prospective Cohort Study

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Minimally invasive surgical techniques require precise psychomotor skills distinct from those used in traditional surgery. Simulation-based training is essential for skill acquisition without patient risk. This study compared two prevalent training methodologies: the Origami-Box-Folding Exercise (OBFE) and Outside-the-Box Knot-Tying Exercise (OBTKE). <b>Methods</b>: In this prospective cohort study, 84 surgical residents (34 OBFE, 50 OBTKE) from General Surgery, Obstetrics-Gynecology, and Urology underwent pre- and post-intervention assessments. Performance metrics included completion times for surgical and square knots, out-of-visual-field instrument instances, needle drops, tissue lesions, and self-assessment via 5-point Likert scales. Behavioral Observation Research Interactive Software quantified performance objectively. Data were analyzed using paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for within-group comparisons and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for between-group differences. <b>Results</b>: Both methodologies significantly improved surgical knot-tying performance. Surgical knot completion time decreased by 316.65 s (OBFE) and 360 s (OBTKE) with no significant between-group difference (<i>p</i> = 0.96). For square knots, OBFE exhibited significantly greater improvement with a 278 s reduction versus 169 s for OBTKE (<i>p</i> = 0.02). Technical errors decreased similarly in both groups. OBFE showed greater improvement in self-rated surgical knot knowledge (<i>p</i> = 0.03) and larger effect sizes for self-assessment measures (0.84-0.87 vs. 0.77-0.85). <b>Conclusions</b>: Both OBFE and OBTKE effectively improve laparoscopic skills in surgical residents. OBFE is particularly beneficial for square knot efficiency and self-rated knowledge enhancement, while OBTKE focuses on targeted knot-tying training. These findings support the implementation of both methodologies in surgical education, potentially in sequence-OBFE for foundational skills and OBTKE for advanced refinement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13212820
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Effectiveness of Origami-Box-Folding and Outside-the-Box Knot-Tying Exercises in Laparoscopic Surgical Training: A Prospective Cohort Study

Daniel Bădescu, George E. D. Petrescu, Cristian Tieranu, G. G. Popescu et al.
Healthcare
Surgical Simulation and Training
article

Comparative Effectiveness of Origami-Box-Folding and Outside-the-Box Knot-Tying Exercises in Laparoscopic Surgical Training: A Prospective Cohort Study

Daniel Bădescu, George E. D. Petrescu, Cristian Tieranu, G. G. Popescu, Adrian‐Iustin Georgevici, Ioana Gabriela Visan, Viorel Jinga, A. Ciudin, Didina-Catalina Barbalata, Ovidiu Cătălin Nechita, Cristian Valentin Toma
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Minimally invasive surgical techniques require precise psychomotor skills distinct from those used in traditional surgery. Simulation-based training is essential for skill acquisition without patient risk. This study compared two prevalent training methodologies: the Origami-Box-Folding Exercise (OBFE) and Outside-the-Box Knot-Tying Exercise (OBTKE). <b>Methods</b>: In this prospective cohort study, 84 surgical residents (34 OBFE, 50 OBTKE) from General Surgery, Obstetrics-Gynecology, and Urology underwent pre- and post-intervention assessments. Performance metrics included completion times for surgical and square knots, out-of-visual-field instrument instances, needle drops, tissue lesions, and self-assessment via 5-point Likert scales. Behavioral Observation Research Interactive Software quantified performance objectively. Data were analyzed using paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for within-group comparisons and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for between-group differences. <b>Results</b>: Both methodologies significantly improved surgical knot-tying performance. Surgical knot completion time decreased by 316.65 s (OBFE) and 360 s (OBTKE) with no significant between-group difference (<i>p</i> = 0.96). For square knots, OBFE exhibited significantly greater improvement with a 278 s reduction versus 169 s for OBTKE (<i>p</i> = 0.02). Technical errors decreased similarly in both groups. OBFE showed greater improvement in self-rated surgical knot knowledge (<i>p</i> = 0.03) and larger effect sizes for self-assessment measures (0.84-0.87 vs. 0.77-0.85). <b>Conclusions</b>: Both OBFE and OBTKE effectively improve laparoscopic skills in surgical residents. OBFE is particularly beneficial for square knot efficiency and self-rated knowledge enhancement, while OBTKE focuses on targeted knot-tying training. These findings support the implementation of both methodologies in surgical education, potentially in sequence-OBFE for foundational skills and OBTKE for advanced refinement.

HealthcareVol. 13(21)
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest (RO), Emergency University (US), Hospital Universitari de Vic (ES), Katholisches Klinikum Bochum (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Surgical Simulation and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.