Comparative Effectiveness of Origami-Box-Folding and Outside-the-Box Knot-Tying Exercises in Laparoscopic Surgical Training: A Prospective Cohort Study
<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Minimally invasive surgical techniques require precise psychomotor skills distinct from those used in traditional surgery. Simulation-based training is essential for skill acquisition without patient risk. This study compared two prevalent training methodologies: the Origami-Box-Folding Exercise (OBFE) and Outside-the-Box Knot-Tying Exercise (OBTKE). <b>Methods</b>: In this prospective cohort study, 84 surgical residents (34 OBFE, 50 OBTKE) from General Surgery, Obstetrics-Gynecology, and Urology underwent pre- and post-intervention assessments. Performance metrics included completion times for surgical and square knots, out-of-visual-field instrument instances, needle drops, tissue lesions, and self-assessment via 5-point Likert scales. Behavioral Observation Research Interactive Software quantified performance objectively. Data were analyzed using paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for within-group comparisons and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for between-group differences. <b>Results</b>: Both methodologies significantly improved surgical knot-tying performance. Surgical knot completion time decreased by 316.65 s (OBFE) and 360 s (OBTKE) with no significant between-group difference (<i>p</i> = 0.96). For square knots, OBFE exhibited significantly greater improvement with a 278 s reduction versus 169 s for OBTKE (<i>p</i> = 0.02). Technical errors decreased similarly in both groups. OBFE showed greater improvement in self-rated surgical knot knowledge (<i>p</i> = 0.03) and larger effect sizes for self-assessment measures (0.84-0.87 vs. 0.77-0.85). <b>Conclusions</b>: Both OBFE and OBTKE effectively improve laparoscopic skills in surgical residents. OBFE is particularly beneficial for square knot efficiency and self-rated knowledge enhancement, while OBTKE focuses on targeted knot-tying training. These findings support the implementation of both methodologies in surgical education, potentially in sequence-OBFE for foundational skills and OBTKE for advanced refinement.
Authors
- Daniel Bădescu
- George E. D. Petrescu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2651-3608)
- Cristian Tieranu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5348-0341)
- G. G. Popescu
- Adrian‐Iustin Georgevici (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2710-2280)
- Ioana Gabriela Visan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6134-0728)
- Viorel Jinga (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7632-5328)
- A. Ciudin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0091-9688)
- Didina-Catalina Barbalata (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7618-5035)
- Ovidiu Cătălin Nechita (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5920-7287)
- Cristian Valentin Toma (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4396-8081)
Institutions
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO)
- Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest (RO)
- Emergency University (US)
- Hospital Universitari de Vic (ES)
- Katholisches Klinikum Bochum (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Healthcare
- Published
- 2025-11-06
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13212820
- Primary Topic
- Surgical Simulation and Training
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00