Clinical Characteristics, Management, and Prognostic Factors of Appendiceal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Insights from a Multicenter International Study

<b>Introduction:</b> Appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms (aNENs) are the most common malignant appendiceal neoplasms. Localized aNENs are typically managed with an appendectomy; however, right colectomy may be necessary in patients with a high risk of nodal disease. However, the role of right hemicolectomy and the optimal surveillance strategy, particularly for tumors between 1 and 2 cm, remains controversial. <b>Material and Methods:</b> This retrospective, observational study evaluated patients diagnosed with aNENs between January 1995 and July 2015 at two tertiary centers in Ireland and Italy. Data were extracted from a prospectively maintained registry and included clinical, pathological, and therapeutic variables, as well as follow-up outcomes. <b>Results:</b> Forty-three patients (41.8% male; median age 27.5 years) were included, with a median follow-up of 49 months. The median tumor size was 6.4 mm (range: 0.6-40 mm). The majority were G1 tumors (58%), and staging distribution was predominantly Stage I (60%). While no significant differences in demographics or tumor features were observed between centers, completion right hemicolectomies were more frequent in the Irish cohort (<i>p</i> = 0.04). Follow-up practices varied, with more intensive imaging and biochemical monitoring observed in the Italian cohort. Overall prognosis was excellent, with a single case of recurrence during the study period. <b>Conclusions:</b> Most aNENs are effectively managed with appendectomy alone, and routine follow-up may be unnecessary in the absence of adverse pathological features. Accurate risk stratification, driven by comprehensive histopathological assessment, is critical for optimizing management and surveillance strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedicines
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13112724
Primary Topic
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Characteristics, Management, and Prognostic Factors of Appendiceal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Insights from a Multicenter International Study

Federica Cavalcoli, Alessandro Del Gobbo, P. Cantù, Alberto Caimo et al.
Biomedicines
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
article

Clinical Characteristics, Management, and Prognostic Factors of Appendiceal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Insights from a Multicenter International Study

Federica Cavalcoli, Alessandro Del Gobbo, P. Cantù, Alberto Caimo, Sara Massironi, Niall Mulligan, Emanuele Rausa, Kamani Samarasinghe, Gianluca Tamagno
article en

Abstract

<b>Introduction:</b> Appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms (aNENs) are the most common malignant appendiceal neoplasms. Localized aNENs are typically managed with an appendectomy; however, right colectomy may be necessary in patients with a high risk of nodal disease. However, the role of right hemicolectomy and the optimal surveillance strategy, particularly for tumors between 1 and 2 cm, remains controversial. <b>Material and Methods:</b> This retrospective, observational study evaluated patients diagnosed with aNENs between January 1995 and July 2015 at two tertiary centers in Ireland and Italy. Data were extracted from a prospectively maintained registry and included clinical, pathological, and therapeutic variables, as well as follow-up outcomes. <b>Results:</b> Forty-three patients (41.8% male; median age 27.5 years) were included, with a median follow-up of 49 months. The median tumor size was 6.4 mm (range: 0.6-40 mm). The majority were G1 tumors (58%), and staging distribution was predominantly Stage I (60%). While no significant differences in demographics or tumor features were observed between centers, completion right hemicolectomies were more frequent in the Irish cohort (<i>p</i> = 0.04). Follow-up practices varied, with more intensive imaging and biochemical monitoring observed in the Italian cohort. Overall prognosis was excellent, with a single case of recurrence during the study period. <b>Conclusions:</b> Most aNENs are effectively managed with appendectomy alone, and routine follow-up may be unnecessary in the absence of adverse pathological features. Accurate risk stratification, driven by comprehensive histopathological assessment, is critical for optimizing management and surveillance strategies.

BiomedicinesVol. 13(11)
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT), Wexford General Hospital (IE), Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT), Mater Misericordiae University Hospital (IE), University Foundation (BE), Technological University Dublin (IE), Sports Surgery Clinic (IE), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.