Failure to replicate effects of parent‐delivered early language intervention: Evidence from a randomised controlled trial with implications for universal language intervention

Abstract Background Parent‐led, preschool language interventions may help to mitigate the risk of poor language and literacy outcomes associated with lower socioeconomic status. This study builds on two previous evaluations of a parent‐led early language teaching programme, which demonstrated mixed findings. Methods A two‐armed randomised controlled trial was conducted with 372 families and their children aged 3–4 years, recruited from 43 schools across the North‐West of England. Families were randomly allocated to either the programme group ( N = 186) who delivered the 20‐min programme 5 days a week for 30 weeks, or the control group ( N = 186) who received storybooks at the end of nursery. Language and early literacy outcomes were assessed at baseline ( t 1), immediately after the 30‐week programme ( t 2) and 10 months later ( t 3). Results Families delivered on average 65% (20/30 weeks) of the intended sessions. There were no significant group differences in language outcomes at immediate (Hedges' g = −0.05 to 0.11) or delayed post‐test ( g = −0.13 to 0.10). Further, no significant group differences were found on measures of early literacy ( g = −0.11 to 0.12), the Home Learning Environment ( g = −0.07) and School Readiness ( g = −0.15). Effects of the programme on language skills were stronger at higher dosage ( g = 0.33 for those completing >90% sessions) and for those with weaker language skills. Conclusions Findings showed no significant effects of intervention. Reasons for null findings are discussed with implications for universal interventions. Recommendations for future trials evaluating interventions of this nature, including targeting of families and children most in need of support, are discussed. Trial Registration This trial was pre‐registered with the ISRCTN registry [ISRCTN52533968 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN52533968 ] on 13/07/2022.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCPP Advances
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.70064
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Language Development and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Failure to replicate effects of parent‐delivered early language intervention: Evidence from a randomised controlled trial with implications for universal language intervention

Helen Cramman, Qing Zhang, Paivi Eerola, Jochen Einbeck et al.
1 citations
JCPP Advances
Language Development and Disorders
3.44
article

Failure to replicate effects of parent‐delivered early language intervention: Evidence from a randomised controlled trial with implications for universal language intervention

Helen Cramman, Qing Zhang, Paivi Eerola, Jochen Einbeck, Kelly Burgoyne, Laura Boundy, Vic Menzies
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Parent‐led, preschool language interventions may help to mitigate the risk of poor language and literacy outcomes associated with lower socioeconomic status. This study builds on two previous evaluations of a parent‐led early language teaching programme, which demonstrated mixed findings. Methods A two‐armed randomised controlled trial was conducted with 372 families and their children aged 3–4 years, recruited from 43 schools across the North‐West of England. Families were randomly allocated to either the programme group ( N = 186) who delivered the 20‐min programme 5 days a week for 30 weeks, or the control group ( N = 186) who received storybooks at the end of nursery. Language and early literacy outcomes were assessed at baseline ( t 1), immediately after the 30‐week programme ( t 2) and 10 months later ( t 3). Results Families delivered on average 65% (20/30 weeks) of the intended sessions. There were no significant group differences in language outcomes at immediate (Hedges' g = −0.05 to 0.11) or delayed post‐test ( g = −0.13 to 0.10). Further, no significant group differences were found on measures of early literacy ( g = −0.11 to 0.12), the Home Learning Environment ( g = −0.07) and School Readiness ( g = −0.15). Effects of the programme on language skills were stronger at higher dosage ( g = 0.33 for those completing >90% sessions) and for those with weaker language skills. Conclusions Findings showed no significant effects of intervention. Reasons for null findings are discussed with implications for universal interventions. Recommendations for future trials evaluating interventions of this nature, including targeting of families and children most in need of support, are discussed. Trial Registration This trial was pre‐registered with the ISRCTN registry [ISRCTN52533968 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN52533968 ] on 13/07/2022.

JCPP Advances
Durham University (GB), Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB), University of Manchester (GB), University College London (GB)
Education Endowment Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Language Development and Disorders
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.