The Pelvic Rosetta Classification Project: An Interdisciplinary Proposal for a Lymph Node Map of the Pelvis in Prostate Cancer

The Pelvic Rosetta Classification (PRC) project aimed to develop an interdisciplinary, landmark-based pelvic lymph node map for patients with prostate cancer to improve communication between imaging specialists and urologists. <b>Methods:</b> After an intense development phase, we conducted 3 evaluation rounds including 19 clinical experts having consensus meetings after each evaluation round. Experts contoured lymph node areas (LNA) for 2 patients with prostate cancer. Contours were assessed qualitatively and quantitatively. The PRC was further validated by assignment of 30 prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT-positive lesions to LNAs. The interrater reliability was calculated using Fleiss κ. Based on the final PRC, a complete contour and a 3-dimensional model were created. <b>Results:</b> Eight pelvic (external iliac, cranial/caudal obturator fossa, dorsal internal iliac, vesico-prostatic pedicle, mesorectal/perirectal, presacral, preprostatic/retropubic) and 4 extrapelvic (common iliac, intercommon, sigmoid, inguinal) LNAs were defined using anatomic landmarks which are consistently recognizable on imaging and intraoperatively. Strong consensus between experts existed for smaller, well-defined LNAs (e.g., preprostatic/retropubic, mesorectal/perirectal LNAs) compared with regions with proportionally large borders (e.g., obturator fossa, vesico-prostatic pedicle LNAs). Overall, moderate agreement (κ = 0.53) was observed during validation. Discrepancies were mostly encountered for lesions adjacent to borders between LNAs. The final contour and 3-dimensional model were approved by all experts. <b>Conclusion:</b> The PRC project showed fair reproducibility and validity. Further external validation is needed to assess its influence on interdisciplinary communication and treatment outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.125.270667
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Pelvic Rosetta Classification Project: An Interdisciplinary Proposal for a Lymph Node Map of the Pelvis in Prostate Cancer

Markus Graefen, Ken Herrmann, Lennart Maack, Christoph Würnschimmel et al.
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

The Pelvic Rosetta Classification Project: An Interdisciplinary Proposal for a Lymph Node Map of the Pelvis in Prostate Cancer

Markus Graefen, Ken Herrmann, Lennart Maack, Christoph Würnschimmel, Simon K. B. Spohn, Daniel Köehler, Jochen Walz, Tobias Maurer, Gernot Ortner, Irene A. Burger, Lale Umutlu, Isabel Rauscher, Matthias Eiber, Agostino Mattei, Boris Hadaschik, Dirk Beyersdorff, Lars Budäus, Ines Maríc, Alexander Schlaefer, Lars Schimmöller, Alexander Haese, Markus Sauer, Francesco Barbato, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, Georg Salomon, Xenia Hoderlein
article en

Abstract

The Pelvic Rosetta Classification (PRC) project aimed to develop an interdisciplinary, landmark-based pelvic lymph node map for patients with prostate cancer to improve communication between imaging specialists and urologists. <b>Methods:</b> After an intense development phase, we conducted 3 evaluation rounds including 19 clinical experts having consensus meetings after each evaluation round. Experts contoured lymph node areas (LNA) for 2 patients with prostate cancer. Contours were assessed qualitatively and quantitatively. The PRC was further validated by assignment of 30 prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT-positive lesions to LNAs. The interrater reliability was calculated using Fleiss κ. Based on the final PRC, a complete contour and a 3-dimensional model were created. <b>Results:</b> Eight pelvic (external iliac, cranial/caudal obturator fossa, dorsal internal iliac, vesico-prostatic pedicle, mesorectal/perirectal, presacral, preprostatic/retropubic) and 4 extrapelvic (common iliac, intercommon, sigmoid, inguinal) LNAs were defined using anatomic landmarks which are consistently recognizable on imaging and intraoperatively. Strong consensus between experts existed for smaller, well-defined LNAs (e.g., preprostatic/retropubic, mesorectal/perirectal LNAs) compared with regions with proportionally large borders (e.g., obturator fossa, vesico-prostatic pedicle LNAs). Overall, moderate agreement (κ = 0.53) was observed during validation. Discrepancies were mostly encountered for lesions adjacent to borders between LNAs. The final contour and 3-dimensional model were approved by all experts. <b>Conclusion:</b> The PRC project showed fair reproducibility and validity. Further external validation is needed to assess its influence on interdisciplinary communication and treatment outcomes.

Journal of Nuclear MedicineVol. 67(1)
Universität Hamburg (DE), University of Lucerne (CH), German Cancer Research Center (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), European Association of Urology (NL), University Medical Center Freiburg (DE), TUM Klinikum (DE), Universitätsklinik Marien Hospital Herne (DE), Düsseldorf University Hospital (DE), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), Martini-Klinik (DE), Essen University Hospital (DE), Kantonsspital Baden (CH), Marien Hospital Düsseldorf (DE), Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille (FR), Institut Paoli-Calmettes (FR), West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen (DE), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE), University of Duisburg-Essen (DE), Hamburg University of Technology (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.