“Playing the Game”: How Supplemental Security Income and Social Security Disability Insurance Recipients Cope with Administrative Burdens

Administrative burden can impede access to programs for individuals with diminished material and cognitive resources. Research shows that individuals may respond to burdens differently—they are either deterred, express grievances, seek information, or leverage relationships and resources to access benefits. This work overlooks disabled Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) recipients, an important vulnerable population, and primarily uses a top-down deductive approach. We depart from this approach through a bottom-up, inductive, grounded theory analysis of the strategies SSI and SSDI participants use to maintain access to programs. Participants describe their relationship with the Social Security Administration as a “game” in which they strive to meet their basic needs although the agency seeks to minimize benefits. They described strategies to maintain SSI, SSDI, and other public benefits as “playing the game.” Strategies included working off the books, underreporting hours, and vigilantly monitoring benefits to catch overpayments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Service Review
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/738192
Primary Topic
Healthcare innovation and challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Playing the Game”: How Supplemental Security Income and Social Security Disability Insurance Recipients Cope with Administrative Burdens

Katie Savin, Carolyn Barnes
Social Service Review
Healthcare innovation and challenges
article

“Playing the Game”: How Supplemental Security Income and Social Security Disability Insurance Recipients Cope with Administrative Burdens

Katie Savin, Carolyn Barnes
article en

Abstract

Administrative burden can impede access to programs for individuals with diminished material and cognitive resources. Research shows that individuals may respond to burdens differently—they are either deterred, express grievances, seek information, or leverage relationships and resources to access benefits. This work overlooks disabled Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) recipients, an important vulnerable population, and primarily uses a top-down deductive approach. We depart from this approach through a bottom-up, inductive, grounded theory analysis of the strategies SSI and SSDI participants use to maintain access to programs. Participants describe their relationship with the Social Security Administration as a “game” in which they strive to meet their basic needs although the agency seeks to minimize benefits. They described strategies to maintain SSI, SSDI, and other public benefits as “playing the game.” Strategies included working off the books, underreporting hours, and vigilantly monitoring benefits to catch overpayments.

Social Service ReviewVol. 99(4)
University of Chicago (US), California State University, Sacramento (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Healthcare innovation and challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.