The directionality of assimilation

Abstract While the contextually determined alternation of the velar and palatal fricatives [x] and [ç] is highly similar in Greek and German, the directionality of assimilation is strikingly different. Whereas Greek opts for anticipatory assimilation, perseveratory assimilation prevails in German. Moreover, this process stays within the confines of the syllable in Greek but may also cross syllable boundaries in German. A lexicon-wide phonotactic analysis reveals that Greek fricatives are mostly restricted to onset positions. By contrast, in German, 75% of the fricative tokens occur as codas and 25% as onsets. It is argued that anticipatory assimilation in Greek results from the restriction of fricatives to onset sites and that perseveratory assimilation in German stems from the preference of fricatives for coda sites. Thus, a probabilistic phonotactic bias leads to a categorical decision on directionality. The strategy of ignoring syllable boundaries allows German to manage with only one type of assimilation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Languages in Contrast
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.00061.ber
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The directionality of assimilation

Thomas Berg
Languages in Contrast
Phonetics and Phonology Research
article

The directionality of assimilation

Thomas Berg
article en

Abstract

Abstract While the contextually determined alternation of the velar and palatal fricatives [x] and [ç] is highly similar in Greek and German, the directionality of assimilation is strikingly different. Whereas Greek opts for anticipatory assimilation, perseveratory assimilation prevails in German. Moreover, this process stays within the confines of the syllable in Greek but may also cross syllable boundaries in German. A lexicon-wide phonotactic analysis reveals that Greek fricatives are mostly restricted to onset positions. By contrast, in German, 75% of the fricative tokens occur as codas and 25% as onsets. It is argued that anticipatory assimilation in Greek results from the restriction of fricatives to onset sites and that perseveratory assimilation in German stems from the preference of fricatives for coda sites. Thus, a probabilistic phonotactic bias leads to a categorical decision on directionality. The strategy of ignoring syllable boundaries allows German to manage with only one type of assimilation.

Languages in Contrast
Universität Hamburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.