Confronting general relativity with principal component analysis: Simulations and results from GWTC-3 events

We present a comprehensive assessment of multiparameter tests of general relativity (GR) in the inspiral regime of compact binary coalescences using principal component analysis (PCA). Our analysis is based on an extensive set of simulated gravitational-wave (GW) signals, including both general relativistic and non-GR sources, injected into zero-noise data colored by the noise power spectral densities of the LIGO and Virgo GW detectors at their designed sensitivities. We evaluate the performance of PCA-based methods in the context of two established frameworks: and . For GR-consistent signals, we find that PCA enables stringent constraints on potential deviations from GR, even in the presence of multiple free parameters. Applying the method to simulated signals that explicitly violate GR, we demonstrate that PCA is effective at identifying such deviations. We further test the method using numerical relativity waveforms of eccentric binary black hole systems and show that missing physical effects—such as orbital eccentricity—can lead to apparent violations of GR if not properly included in the waveform models used for analysis. Finally, we apply our PCA-based test to selected real gravitational-wave events from GWTC-3, including GW190814 and GW190412. We present joint constraints from selected binary black hole events in GWTC-3, finding that the 90% credible bound on the most informative PCA parameter is <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:mrow> <a:msubsup> <a:mrow> <a:mn>0.03</a:mn> </a:mrow> <a:mrow> <a:mo>−</a:mo> <a:mn>0.08</a:mn> </a:mrow> <a:mrow> <a:mo>+</a:mo> <a:mn>0.08</a:mn> </a:mrow> </a:msubsup> </a:mrow> </a:math> in the framework and <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <c:mo>−</c:mo> <c:mn>0.0</c:mn> <c:msubsup> <c:mn>1</c:mn> <c:mrow> <c:mo>−</c:mo> <c:mn>0.04</c:mn> </c:mrow> <c:mrow> <c:mo>+</c:mo> <c:mn>0.05</c:mn> </c:mrow> </c:msubsup> </c:math> in the framework, both of which are consistent with GR. These results highlight the sensitivity and robustness of the PCA-based approach and demonstrate its readiness for application to future observational data from the fourth observing runs of LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/c1sj-jc4v
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.62
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Confronting general relativity with principal component analysis: Simulations and results from GWTC-3 events

K. G. Arun, Ish Gupta, Jan Steinhoff, P. Narayan et al.
4 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
4.62
article

Confronting general relativity with principal component analysis: Simulations and results from GWTC-3 events

K. G. Arun, Ish Gupta, Jan Steinhoff, P. Narayan, Sayantani Datta, Parthapratim Mahapatra, Poulami Dutta Roy, B. S. Sathyaprakash, Deirdre Shoemaker, Soumen Roy, A. J. Weinstein, Anuradha Gupta, M. Saleem
article en
4 citations

Abstract

We present a comprehensive assessment of multiparameter tests of general relativity (GR) in the inspiral regime of compact binary coalescences using principal component analysis (PCA). Our analysis is based on an extensive set of simulated gravitational-wave (GW) signals, including both general relativistic and non-GR sources, injected into zero-noise data colored by the noise power spectral densities of the LIGO and Virgo GW detectors at their designed sensitivities. We evaluate the performance of PCA-based methods in the context of two established frameworks: and . For GR-consistent signals, we find that PCA enables stringent constraints on potential deviations from GR, even in the presence of multiple free parameters. Applying the method to simulated signals that explicitly violate GR, we demonstrate that PCA is effective at identifying such deviations. We further test the method using numerical relativity waveforms of eccentric binary black hole systems and show that missing physical effects—such as orbital eccentricity—can lead to apparent violations of GR if not properly included in the waveform models used for analysis. Finally, we apply our PCA-based test to selected real gravitational-wave events from GWTC-3, including GW190814 and GW190412. We present joint constraints from selected binary black hole events in GWTC-3, finding that the 90% credible bound on the most informative PCA parameter is <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:mrow> <a:msubsup> <a:mrow> <a:mn>0.03</a:mn> </a:mrow> <a:mrow> <a:mo>−</a:mo> <a:mn>0.08</a:mn> </a:mrow> <a:mrow> <a:mo>+</a:mo> <a:mn>0.08</a:mn> </a:mrow> </a:msubsup> </a:mrow> </a:math> in the framework and <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <c:mo>−</c:mo> <c:mn>0.0</c:mn> <c:msubsup> <c:mn>1</c:mn> <c:mrow> <c:mo>−</c:mo> <c:mn>0.04</c:mn> </c:mrow> <c:mrow> <c:mo>+</c:mo> <c:mn>0.05</c:mn> </c:mrow> </c:msubsup> </c:math> in the framework, both of which are consistent with GR. These results highlight the sensitivity and robustness of the PCA-based approach and demonstrate its readiness for application to future observational data from the fourth observing runs of LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 112(10)
California Institute of Technology (US), Pennsylvania State University (US), Chennai Mathematical Institute (IN), Royal Observatory of Belgium (BE), University of Florida (US), University of Mississippi (US), Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (DE), University of Virginia (US), Cardiff University (GB), The University of Texas at Austin (US), UCLouvain (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
4.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.