Analyses of markets and outlet choice of smallholder chickpea producers in the Central Gondar Zone, Ethiopia

This study analyzed factors influencing chickpea producers’ market outlet choices using data from 369 smallholder farmers and traders. The descriptive statistics, results showed that producers sold 25.2% to rural collectors, 21.7% to retailers, 21.2% to wholesalers, and 19.3% directly to consumers. The market was moderately concentrated, with top four traders controlling 36.05%. The analysis showed that multiple factors influence chickpea marketing choices. Selling to rural collectors increased with quantity supplied (p < 0.05) and extension services (p < 0.01) but declined with higher education (p < 0.05). Consumer channels were favored by market information (p < 0.05), experience (p < 0.1), and extension contact (p < 0.01), yet discouraged by older age and higher lagged prices (p < 0.01). Wholesaler choice was driven by education, credit access, and quantity produced (p < 0.01). Cooperative participation depended on quantity supplied, credit, non-farm activity (p < 0.01), lagged price, and land size (p < 0.05). The MNL model confirmed these findings, highlighting that education, production, and extension services (p < 0.01) increased sales to wholesalers or consumers, while experience (p < 0.01) reduced them. Participation in rural collectors increased with experience (p < 0.01) and distance (p < 0.05), while land size (p < 0.01) and household size (p < 0.1) were also important factors for cooperatives. Enhancing smallholders’ access to credit, market information, and extension services, together with increasing production and strengthening institutional support and market infrastructure, can improve and integrate farmers into profitable chickpea value chains, and boost their incomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Food & Agriculture
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2025.2575027
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyses of markets and outlet choice of smallholder chickpea producers in the Central Gondar Zone, Ethiopia

Kassahun Tassie, Anteneh Mulugeta, Bosena Tegegne, Ermias Tesfaye et al.
2 citations
Cogent Food & Agriculture
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
9.66
article

Analyses of markets and outlet choice of smallholder chickpea producers in the Central Gondar Zone, Ethiopia

Kassahun Tassie, Anteneh Mulugeta, Bosena Tegegne, Ermias Tesfaye, Derebe Marie
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study analyzed factors influencing chickpea producers’ market outlet choices using data from 369 smallholder farmers and traders. The descriptive statistics, results showed that producers sold 25.2% to rural collectors, 21.7% to retailers, 21.2% to wholesalers, and 19.3% directly to consumers. The market was moderately concentrated, with top four traders controlling 36.05%. The analysis showed that multiple factors influence chickpea marketing choices. Selling to rural collectors increased with quantity supplied (p < 0.05) and extension services (p < 0.01) but declined with higher education (p < 0.05). Consumer channels were favored by market information (p < 0.05), experience (p < 0.1), and extension contact (p < 0.01), yet discouraged by older age and higher lagged prices (p < 0.01). Wholesaler choice was driven by education, credit access, and quantity produced (p < 0.01). Cooperative participation depended on quantity supplied, credit, non-farm activity (p < 0.01), lagged price, and land size (p < 0.05). The MNL model confirmed these findings, highlighting that education, production, and extension services (p < 0.01) increased sales to wholesalers or consumers, while experience (p < 0.01) reduced them. Participation in rural collectors increased with experience (p < 0.01) and distance (p < 0.05), while land size (p < 0.01) and household size (p < 0.1) were also important factors for cooperatives. Enhancing smallholders’ access to credit, market information, and extension services, together with increasing production and strengthening institutional support and market infrastructure, can improve and integrate farmers into profitable chickpea value chains, and boost their incomes.

Cogent Food & AgricultureVol. 11(1)
Debark University (ET), Bahir Dar University (ET), Agricultural & Applied Economics Association (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
9.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.