Deep Learning at Two Timescales: Dual Neural Networks for Predicting Fast Urban and Slow Karst Floods

Flash floods in urban and karst environments present major modeling challenges due to their complex hydrodynamics, characterized by a rapid urban runoff response and a delayed slower karst groundwater response. This study explores the use of artificial neural networks ANN (multilayer perceptron in particular) to predict flash floods at the downstream of the Las River in Toulon (France). The Las River is fed in a larger proportion by the nearby karst springs and in a smaller proportion by the urban drainage network. In this study, we propose an ensemble modeling strategy to address the system’s double hydrological regime. The initial step was to identify rainfall events in the six-year hydrometeorological database and classify them according to their karst contributions. Two specialized models: urban runoff model (UM) and karst model (KM) were trained solely on each event type (urban runoff and karst events). These models were combined by two methods in an attempt model all events, disregarding of their event type: the first approach was to combine the outputs of the specialized models in an ANN called output combination model (OM), the second approach was to combine the structures of the specialized models and retraining the model parameters called structure combination model (SM). A third more “basic” approach, called bulk model (BM), was to optimize the ANN by selecting the inputs with the best performance improvements. As expected, the specialized models (UM and KM) performed the best on the cross-validation sets and on the test sets on their respective event types but failed to generalize across regimes. The OM was the most robust ensemble strategy across all event types with consistent accuracy on predicting both urban runoff and karst flood events. The BM was better on the karst events while having worst performance on karst events and the SM was the least accurate model. These findings confirm the added value of combining specialized ANNs to model complex hydrological systems. In addition, selecting the right inputs to the models has a bigger impact on the model’s performance than choosing its structure by changing its hyperparameters.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Inżynieria Mineralna
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29227/im-2025-02-03-27
Primary Topic
Karst Systems and Hydrogeology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep Learning at Two Timescales: Dual Neural Networks for Predicting Fast Urban and Slow Karst Floods

Julien Yise Peniel Adounkpe, Séverin Pistre, Alain Dezetter, Guillaume Artigue et al.
Inżynieria Mineralna
Karst Systems and Hydrogeology
article

Deep Learning at Two Timescales: Dual Neural Networks for Predicting Fast Urban and Slow Karst Floods

Julien Yise Peniel Adounkpe, Séverin Pistre, Alain Dezetter, Guillaume Artigue, Octavian Dobricean, Anne Johannet, Bruno Arfib, Valentin Wendling, Kalil Traoré
article en

Abstract

Flash floods in urban and karst environments present major modeling challenges due to their complex hydrodynamics, characterized by a rapid urban runoff response and a delayed slower karst groundwater response. This study explores the use of artificial neural networks ANN (multilayer perceptron in particular) to predict flash floods at the downstream of the Las River in Toulon (France). The Las River is fed in a larger proportion by the nearby karst springs and in a smaller proportion by the urban drainage network. In this study, we propose an ensemble modeling strategy to address the system’s double hydrological regime. The initial step was to identify rainfall events in the six-year hydrometeorological database and classify them according to their karst contributions. Two specialized models: urban runoff model (UM) and karst model (KM) were trained solely on each event type (urban runoff and karst events). These models were combined by two methods in an attempt model all events, disregarding of their event type: the first approach was to combine the outputs of the specialized models in an ANN called output combination model (OM), the second approach was to combine the structures of the specialized models and retraining the model parameters called structure combination model (SM). A third more “basic” approach, called bulk model (BM), was to optimize the ANN by selecting the inputs with the best performance improvements. As expected, the specialized models (UM and KM) performed the best on the cross-validation sets and on the test sets on their respective event types but failed to generalize across regimes. The OM was the most robust ensemble strategy across all event types with consistent accuracy on predicting both urban runoff and karst flood events. The BM was better on the karst events while having worst performance on karst events and the SM was the least accurate model. These findings confirm the added value of combining specialized ANNs to model complex hydrological systems. In addition, selecting the right inputs to the models has a bigger impact on the model’s performance than choosing its structure by changing its hyperparameters.

Inżynieria MineralnaVol. 3(2)
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Karst Systems and Hydrogeology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.