Effects of transcutaneous electrical stimulation on peripheral nerve regeneration after digital neurorrhaphy: A randomized clinical trial.

<ns7:p>Background Sensory recovery following digital nerve neurorrhaphy is often incomplete, and strategies to enhance regeneration remain under investigation. Low-frequency transcutaneous electrical stimulation has been proposed as a potential adjunctive therapy, but its efficacy in clinical settings is uncertain. Methods In this randomized controlled trial, 32 patients with isolated traumatic digital nerve injuries underwent surgical neurorrhaphy at a tertiary care hospital. Participants were randomly allocated to an intervention group (n = 16) or sham group (n = 16). The intervention consisted of a single postoperative session of square-pulsed, biphasic transcutaneous electrical stimulation at 20 Hz for 1 hour. The sham group received identical conditions without active stimulation. After stimulation, patients underwent physiotherapy sessions for three months. Sensory recovery was assessed using Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing and two-point discrimination at baseline, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. Results Both groups showed progressive sensory improvement throughout follow-up, approaching normal values at 3 months. No statistically significant differences were observed between groups in any outcome measure. Confidence intervals for group comparisons overlapped, and no clinically meaningful differences were detected. No adverse effects were reported. Conclusions A single postoperative session of low-frequency transcutaneous electrical stimulation did not significantly enhance sensory recovery after digital nerve repair. Further research with varied stimulation protocols, repeated sessions, or extended follow-up may be warranted to clarify its potential role in peripheral nerve regeneration. Level of Evidence Therapeutic Level I.</ns7:p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
F1000Research
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.169801.1
Primary Topic
Planarian Biology and Electrostimulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of transcutaneous electrical stimulation on peripheral nerve regeneration after digital neurorrhaphy: A randomized clinical trial.

Abrahão Fontes Baptista, Yossi Zana, Enilton de Santana Ribeiro de Mattos, Alex Guedes et al.
F1000Research
Planarian Biology and Electrostimulation
article

Effects of transcutaneous electrical stimulation on peripheral nerve regeneration after digital neurorrhaphy: A randomized clinical trial.

Abrahão Fontes Baptista, Yossi Zana, Enilton de Santana Ribeiro de Mattos, Alex Guedes, Paulo Itamar Ferraz Lessa, Eduardo Silva Reis Barreto, César Romero Antunes Júnior
article en

Abstract

<ns7:p>Background Sensory recovery following digital nerve neurorrhaphy is often incomplete, and strategies to enhance regeneration remain under investigation. Low-frequency transcutaneous electrical stimulation has been proposed as a potential adjunctive therapy, but its efficacy in clinical settings is uncertain. Methods In this randomized controlled trial, 32 patients with isolated traumatic digital nerve injuries underwent surgical neurorrhaphy at a tertiary care hospital. Participants were randomly allocated to an intervention group (n = 16) or sham group (n = 16). The intervention consisted of a single postoperative session of square-pulsed, biphasic transcutaneous electrical stimulation at 20 Hz for 1 hour. The sham group received identical conditions without active stimulation. After stimulation, patients underwent physiotherapy sessions for three months. Sensory recovery was assessed using Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing and two-point discrimination at baseline, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. Results Both groups showed progressive sensory improvement throughout follow-up, approaching normal values at 3 months. No statistically significant differences were observed between groups in any outcome measure. Confidence intervals for group comparisons overlapped, and no clinically meaningful differences were detected. No adverse effects were reported. Conclusions A single postoperative session of low-frequency transcutaneous electrical stimulation did not significantly enhance sensory recovery after digital nerve repair. Further research with varied stimulation protocols, repeated sessions, or extended follow-up may be warranted to clarify its potential role in peripheral nerve regeneration. Level of Evidence Therapeutic Level I.</ns7:p>

F1000ResearchVol. 14
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Universidade Federal da Bahia (BR), Universidade do Estado da Bahia (BR), Universidade Federal do ABC (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Planarian Biology and Electrostimulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.