Diagnostic accuracy of AI or DL-enhanced technologies in the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review

Abstract Background Diabetic retinopathy (DR) remains a leading cause of preventable vision loss globally, particularly among individuals with long-standing diabetes. Conventional DR screening methods, such as manual retinal grading by ophthalmologists, are labor-intensive, time-consuming, and subject to inter-grader variability. These limitations highlight the urgent need for automated, scalable, and reliable diagnostic solutions that can improve early detection and the need for clinical detection. Objective This systematic review aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning (DL) models for DR detection, with a particular focus on hybrid architectures that combine convolutional neural networks (CNNs), Vision Transformers (ViTs), and traditional machine learning (ML) classifiers. Methods A comprehensive search of six databases covering 2012–2024 identified 327 studies, of which 20 met the inclusion criteria. Two independent reviewers conducted screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the QUADAS-2 tool. Due to heterogeneity in model architectures, datasets, and reporting, a meta-analysis was not feasible. Complete database search strategies are available in the supplementary appendix. Results Hybrid AI models consistently outperformed conventional DL and ML approaches, achieving sensitivities of 92–100% and specificities above 80%. Models that integrated both fundus photography and optical coherence tomography (OCT) images achieved the highest diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 97.2%). Attention mechanisms, ensemble learning, and explainable AI (XAI) methods (e.g., Grad-CAM, LIME) enhanced model interpretability and clinical applicability. Conclusions Hybrid AI-based diagnostic platforms show strong potential to transform DR screening by offering improved scalability, accuracy, and cost-effectiveness. However, clinical translation will require greater data diversity, robust external validation, and regulatory compliance. These findings provide timely evidence to support the integration of AI-driven DR screening into national diabetes strategies and public health policies, particularly in regions with high diabetes prevalence, such as Qatar and the Middle East.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Imaging and Interventional Radiology
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44326-025-00083-w
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic accuracy of AI or DL-enhanced technologies in the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review

Reem Dhobaian Alshammari, Wajiha Moussa Abu Haliqa, Rawan Youssef Majzoub
1 citations
Journal of Medical Imaging and Interventional Radiology
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
1.36
article

Diagnostic accuracy of AI or DL-enhanced technologies in the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review

Reem Dhobaian Alshammari, Wajiha Moussa Abu Haliqa, Rawan Youssef Majzoub
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Diabetic retinopathy (DR) remains a leading cause of preventable vision loss globally, particularly among individuals with long-standing diabetes. Conventional DR screening methods, such as manual retinal grading by ophthalmologists, are labor-intensive, time-consuming, and subject to inter-grader variability. These limitations highlight the urgent need for automated, scalable, and reliable diagnostic solutions that can improve early detection and the need for clinical detection. Objective This systematic review aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning (DL) models for DR detection, with a particular focus on hybrid architectures that combine convolutional neural networks (CNNs), Vision Transformers (ViTs), and traditional machine learning (ML) classifiers. Methods A comprehensive search of six databases covering 2012–2024 identified 327 studies, of which 20 met the inclusion criteria. Two independent reviewers conducted screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the QUADAS-2 tool. Due to heterogeneity in model architectures, datasets, and reporting, a meta-analysis was not feasible. Complete database search strategies are available in the supplementary appendix. Results Hybrid AI models consistently outperformed conventional DL and ML approaches, achieving sensitivities of 92–100% and specificities above 80%. Models that integrated both fundus photography and optical coherence tomography (OCT) images achieved the highest diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 97.2%). Attention mechanisms, ensemble learning, and explainable AI (XAI) methods (e.g., Grad-CAM, LIME) enhanced model interpretability and clinical applicability. Conclusions Hybrid AI-based diagnostic platforms show strong potential to transform DR screening by offering improved scalability, accuracy, and cost-effectiveness. However, clinical translation will require greater data diversity, robust external validation, and regulatory compliance. These findings provide timely evidence to support the integration of AI-driven DR screening into national diabetes strategies and public health policies, particularly in regions with high diabetes prevalence, such as Qatar and the Middle East.

Journal of Medical Imaging and Interventional RadiologyVol. 12(1)
Qatar Airways (Qatar) (QA), Hamad Medical Corporation (QA), Qatar University (QA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
1.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.