Validity and reliability of the A-test in assessing the functional capacity of patients with heart failure

Background/Aim. Before initiating early rehabilitation, it is essential to assess the functional status of patients with heart failure (HF). Although the Barthel Index (BI) is well-established, the A-test, originally developed for traumatology and orthopedic patients, has recently been introduced into broader clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the A-test in assessing functional status in patients with HF. Methods. The study included patients of both sexes with HF, regardless of age or left ventricular ejection fraction, classified according to the New York Heart Association (NY-HA) I?IV class, with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores ? 24, who were tested daily at the same time. Two experienced senior physiotherapists performed the testing, and they completed the A-test and BI separately. Results. A total of 77 patients were enrolled, two-thirds of whom were male, with a mean age of 72 years and a mean ejection fraction of 41.83% [standard deviation (SD) = 11.46]. The average NYHA class at admission, 2.75 (SD = 1.05), and discharge, 2.42 (SD = 1.12), showed a statistically significant improvement (Z = -4.914, p < 0.001). Content validity was supported by low floor (minimal score = 2.0%) and ceiling (maximal score = 10.8%) effects, a wide range of scores (0?50), and appropriate score distribution. Concurrent validity was confirmed by a strong correlation between the A-test and BI (? = 0.991, p < 0.001). Predictive validity was demonstrated, as the A-test score on the first day significantly predicted BI at discharge (? = 0.880, p < 0.001, 95% confidence interval: 1.087?1.562). Construct validity was confirmed through four hypotheses. Patients in NYHA class I?II, with higher MMSE scores and higher left ventricular ejection fractions, scored significantly better on the A-test. Age had a significant effect on the results. The A-test demonstrated excellent internal consistency (? = 0.971) and high inter-rater reliability (? = 0.842). Conclusion. The A-test is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating the functional capacity of patients with HF.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vojnosanitetski pregled
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2298/vsp250528075i
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validity and reliability of the A-test in assessing the functional capacity of patients with heart failure

Slobodan Obradović, Dejan Ilić, J Djurdjević, Dragana Tomić
Vojnosanitetski pregled
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
article

Validity and reliability of the A-test in assessing the functional capacity of patients with heart failure

Slobodan Obradović, Dejan Ilić, J Djurdjević, Dragana Tomić
article en

Abstract

Background/Aim. Before initiating early rehabilitation, it is essential to assess the functional status of patients with heart failure (HF). Although the Barthel Index (BI) is well-established, the A-test, originally developed for traumatology and orthopedic patients, has recently been introduced into broader clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the A-test in assessing functional status in patients with HF. Methods. The study included patients of both sexes with HF, regardless of age or left ventricular ejection fraction, classified according to the New York Heart Association (NY-HA) I?IV class, with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores ? 24, who were tested daily at the same time. Two experienced senior physiotherapists performed the testing, and they completed the A-test and BI separately. Results. A total of 77 patients were enrolled, two-thirds of whom were male, with a mean age of 72 years and a mean ejection fraction of 41.83% [standard deviation (SD) = 11.46]. The average NYHA class at admission, 2.75 (SD = 1.05), and discharge, 2.42 (SD = 1.12), showed a statistically significant improvement (Z = -4.914, p < 0.001). Content validity was supported by low floor (minimal score = 2.0%) and ceiling (maximal score = 10.8%) effects, a wide range of scores (0?50), and appropriate score distribution. Concurrent validity was confirmed by a strong correlation between the A-test and BI (? = 0.991, p < 0.001). Predictive validity was demonstrated, as the A-test score on the first day significantly predicted BI at discharge (? = 0.880, p < 0.001, 95% confidence interval: 1.087?1.562). Construct validity was confirmed through four hypotheses. Patients in NYHA class I?II, with higher MMSE scores and higher left ventricular ejection fractions, scored significantly better on the A-test. Age had a significant effect on the results. The A-test demonstrated excellent internal consistency (? = 0.971) and high inter-rater reliability (? = 0.842). Conclusion. The A-test is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating the functional capacity of patients with HF.

Vojnosanitetski pregledVol. 82(12)
Military Medical Academy (RS), University of Defence (RS)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.