Testing two digital stress-management interventions in a randomized controlled trial of breast cancer patients

The digital stress-management intervention StressProffen has been shown to be associated with improved well-being and quality of life for cancer survivors. In the Coping After Breast Cancer (CABC) trial, effects of 6 months' access to modified versions of StressProffen, delivered through a digital download-only model, were examined. Women with breast cancer were invited to participate in the trial 6-9 months following diagnosis. Eligible participants were randomized to either: (1) digital cognitive behavioral therapy stress-management intervention (CBI), n = 140, (2) digital mindfulness-based stress-management intervention (MBI), n = 143, or (3) usual-care (control group), n = 147. Primary outcome was change in perceived stress level (PSS-10), while secondary outcomes included changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL), anxiety and depression, fatigue, mindfulness, sleep and coping. Perceived stress level at baseline was low for all groups. No statistically significant mean differences (MD) were detected between either of the intervention groups and the control group from baseline to 6-month follow-up for perceived stress level (MBI: MD -0.28 [95%CI: -1.75, 1.19], CBI: MD -0.42 [95%CI: -1.89, 1.06]), nor for the majority of the secondary outcomes. After 6 months of access, the CBI and MBI stress-management interventions did not yield significantly improved outcomes for women with breast cancer compared with usual-care controls. Further explorations of which interventions and delivery models may optimize use and effect, best timing for delivery, and individual preferences are needed. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04480203.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-22889-0
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing two digital stress-management interventions in a randomized controlled trial of breast cancer patients

Cecilie E. Kiserud, Ingvil Mjaaland, Anders Meland, Ylva Maria Gjelsvik et al.
Scientific Reports
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Testing two digital stress-management interventions in a randomized controlled trial of breast cancer patients

Cecilie E. Kiserud, Ingvil Mjaaland, Anders Meland, Ylva Maria Gjelsvik, Trudie Chalder, Linda E. Carlson, Christine M Rygg, Lise Solberg Nes, Hege R. Eriksen, Giske Ursin, Tor Åge Myklebust, Karianne Svendsen, Michael H. Antoni, Elin Børøsund, Aina Balto, Sigrid Leithe, Ine M. Larsson
article en

Abstract

The digital stress-management intervention StressProffen has been shown to be associated with improved well-being and quality of life for cancer survivors. In the Coping After Breast Cancer (CABC) trial, effects of 6 months' access to modified versions of StressProffen, delivered through a digital download-only model, were examined. Women with breast cancer were invited to participate in the trial 6-9 months following diagnosis. Eligible participants were randomized to either: (1) digital cognitive behavioral therapy stress-management intervention (CBI), n = 140, (2) digital mindfulness-based stress-management intervention (MBI), n = 143, or (3) usual-care (control group), n = 147. Primary outcome was change in perceived stress level (PSS-10), while secondary outcomes included changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL), anxiety and depression, fatigue, mindfulness, sleep and coping. Perceived stress level at baseline was low for all groups. No statistically significant mean differences (MD) were detected between either of the intervention groups and the control group from baseline to 6-month follow-up for perceived stress level (MBI: MD -0.28 [95%CI: -1.75, 1.19], CBI: MD -0.42 [95%CI: -1.89, 1.06]), nor for the majority of the secondary outcomes. After 6 months of access, the CBI and MBI stress-management interventions did not yield significantly improved outcomes for women with breast cancer compared with usual-care controls. Further explorations of which interventions and delivery models may optimize use and effect, best timing for delivery, and individual preferences are needed. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04480203.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
University of Southern California (US), Oslo University Hospital (NO), Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO), University of Calgary (CA), Western Norway University of Applied Sciences (NO), King's College London (GB), University of Oslo (NO), Stavanger University Hospital (NO), University of South-Eastern Norway (NO), Rochester Christian University (US), Cancer Registry of Norway (NO), Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), University of Rochester (US), Norwegian School of Sport Sciences (NO)
Kreftforeningen, Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.