Vertebrates as victims of domestic cats and dogs: ten years of data from an Italian animal rescue centre (2015–2024)

Regional wildlife rescue centres maintain annual records that provide information essential for estimating the impact of domestic animals on wildlife populations. In particular, the Campomorone Rescue Centre (CRAS) in Genoa (north-western Italy) serves the entire territory of Liguria (nearly 5,400 km 2 ) and some nearby areas of southern Piedmont. Quantitative analyses of data collected by CRAS over a ten-year period (2015–2024) indicate that, of the 15,352 wild vertebrates hospitalised for treatment, 954 were known to be injured by cats or dogs. More specifically, it concerns 695 birds, 57 bats, 192 non-flying mammals and 10 reptiles. Reptiles, birds (above all passerines) and bats are mainly prey for cats, while dogs preferentially attack non-flying mammals. As reported in several other studies, the incidence of predation by cats was significantly higher than by dogs: 810 and 144 wild vertebrates, respectively. This figure suggests a gross under-reporting of the impact that cats and dogs have on wildlife populations. Moreover, considering the relatively small regional areas of Liguria and south Piedmont, the CRAS records further understate the real extent of predation by cats and dogs across Italy. Italy’s rescue centres provide a vital network for monitoring the impacts of domestic and feral animals on wildlife. Domestic cats and dogs not only injure and kill wild animals, they also destroy eggs and nests and transmit diseases, all of which can contribute to a decrease in the biodiversity and ‘genetic fitness’ of wildlife populations. Therefore, wildlife species would greatly benefit from the development and implementation of policies and educational programmes designed to increase awareness of the value of wildlife for healthy ecosystems amongst the general populace, particularly pet owners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Conservation
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.60.158205
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vertebrates as victims of domestic cats and dogs: ten years of data from an Italian animal rescue centre (2015–2024)

A.S. Molyneux, Loris Galli, Gabriele Dessalvi, Enrico Borgo et al.
1 citations
Nature Conservation
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.72
article

Vertebrates as victims of domestic cats and dogs: ten years of data from an Italian animal rescue centre (2015–2024)

A.S. Molyneux, Loris Galli, Gabriele Dessalvi, Enrico Borgo, Davide Rufino
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Regional wildlife rescue centres maintain annual records that provide information essential for estimating the impact of domestic animals on wildlife populations. In particular, the Campomorone Rescue Centre (CRAS) in Genoa (north-western Italy) serves the entire territory of Liguria (nearly 5,400 km 2 ) and some nearby areas of southern Piedmont. Quantitative analyses of data collected by CRAS over a ten-year period (2015–2024) indicate that, of the 15,352 wild vertebrates hospitalised for treatment, 954 were known to be injured by cats or dogs. More specifically, it concerns 695 birds, 57 bats, 192 non-flying mammals and 10 reptiles. Reptiles, birds (above all passerines) and bats are mainly prey for cats, while dogs preferentially attack non-flying mammals. As reported in several other studies, the incidence of predation by cats was significantly higher than by dogs: 810 and 144 wild vertebrates, respectively. This figure suggests a gross under-reporting of the impact that cats and dogs have on wildlife populations. Moreover, considering the relatively small regional areas of Liguria and south Piedmont, the CRAS records further understate the real extent of predation by cats and dogs across Italy. Italy’s rescue centres provide a vital network for monitoring the impacts of domestic and feral animals on wildlife. Domestic cats and dogs not only injure and kill wild animals, they also destroy eggs and nests and transmit diseases, all of which can contribute to a decrease in the biodiversity and ‘genetic fitness’ of wildlife populations. Therefore, wildlife species would greatly benefit from the development and implementation of policies and educational programmes designed to increase awareness of the value of wildlife for healthy ecosystems amongst the general populace, particularly pet owners.

Nature ConservationVol. 60
IP Australia (AU), Terminal San Giorgio (Italy) (IT), University of Genoa (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.