Enhancing Documentation Standards of Complications in Informed Consent for Neck of Femur Fracture Surgery

Background Neck of femur (NOF) fractures are a major cause of morbidity in the United Kingdom. Operative management is the standard of care, and informed consent is essential to ensure patients understand potential benefits and complications arising during the surgical management of NOF fractures. This study aimed to assess and enhance the quality of Consent Form 1 documentation of complications of NOF fracture surgery as per the British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) and to assess improvements following focused interventions. Methodology A closed-loop audit was conducted in the Trauma and Orthopaedic Department, Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, from February to October 2024. In the first cycle, we analyzed the Consent Form 1 retrospectively for the documentation of complications. Interventions for improvement were performed, including teaching sessions and posters on consent documentation. The second cycle assessed post-intervention practice. The study encompassed patients with capacity who underwent fixation, hemiarthroplasty, or total hip replacement (THR). Documentation was considered complete if it included all common, less common, and rare complications. Results The initial documentation rates were modest, with fewer than 50% of forms recording pain, catheterization, avascular necrosis, hip stiffness, limb length discrepancy, and mortality. Post-intervention improvements were observed, including pain, avascular necrosis, and death for NOF fixation, alongside better values of infection, altered wound healing, pulmonary embolism, and bone damage for hemiarthroplasty. For THR, improvements were seen in the documentation of bleeding, dislocation, blood clots, prosthetic wear, infections, altered wound healing, bone damage, and death. Conclusions Targeted teaching and visual reminders improved documentation, but there are persistent gaps. Further strategies are required to standardize consent practices and ensure complete patient information in line with BOA guidance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.96220
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Documentation Standards of Complications in Informed Consent for Neck of Femur Fracture Surgery

Aaisha Shahbaz, Deepa Bose, Dinesh Yasothkumar, Rizwan Akbar et al.
Cureus
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
article

Enhancing Documentation Standards of Complications in Informed Consent for Neck of Femur Fracture Surgery

Aaisha Shahbaz, Deepa Bose, Dinesh Yasothkumar, Rizwan Akbar, Rohma Shahbaz, Fahad Imami
article en

Abstract

Background Neck of femur (NOF) fractures are a major cause of morbidity in the United Kingdom. Operative management is the standard of care, and informed consent is essential to ensure patients understand potential benefits and complications arising during the surgical management of NOF fractures. This study aimed to assess and enhance the quality of Consent Form 1 documentation of complications of NOF fracture surgery as per the British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) and to assess improvements following focused interventions. Methodology A closed-loop audit was conducted in the Trauma and Orthopaedic Department, Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, from February to October 2024. In the first cycle, we analyzed the Consent Form 1 retrospectively for the documentation of complications. Interventions for improvement were performed, including teaching sessions and posters on consent documentation. The second cycle assessed post-intervention practice. The study encompassed patients with capacity who underwent fixation, hemiarthroplasty, or total hip replacement (THR). Documentation was considered complete if it included all common, less common, and rare complications. Results The initial documentation rates were modest, with fewer than 50% of forms recording pain, catheterization, avascular necrosis, hip stiffness, limb length discrepancy, and mortality. Post-intervention improvements were observed, including pain, avascular necrosis, and death for NOF fixation, alongside better values of infection, altered wound healing, pulmonary embolism, and bone damage for hemiarthroplasty. For THR, improvements were seen in the documentation of bleeding, dislocation, blood clots, prosthetic wear, infections, altered wound healing, bone damage, and death. Conclusions Targeted teaching and visual reminders improved documentation, but there are persistent gaps. Further strategies are required to standardize consent practices and ensure complete patient information in line with BOA guidance.

CureusVol. 17(11)
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Combined Military Hospital (PK), Hayatabad Medical Complex (PK), University College Birmingham (GB), Air University (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.