Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for survival in patients with brain metastases from colorectal cancer

Brain metastases from colorectal cancer are rare but carry a dismal prognosis. This study aimed to develop and externally validate a prognostic model for individualized survival prediction in affected patients. The model was constructed using a training cohort of 112 patients diagnosed with brain metastases after initial colorectal cancer treatment at our institution between 1985 and 2017, and validated in an external cohort of 114 patients referred for brain metastasis treatment between 1987 and 2017. A nomogram was developed incorporating five variables: age, performance status assessed by the Karnofsky Performance Status scale, number of brain metastases, maximum size of brain lesions, and number of prior systemic chemotherapy regimens. In the training cohort, the median survival was 6.6 months, with 1-year and 3-year survival rates of 29.0% and 7.2%. Poorer performance status, multiple metastases, and higher number of chemotherapy regimens were associated with worse prognosis. In the validation cohort, median survival was 5.8 months, with 1-year and 3-year survival rates of 27.0% and 8.4%. Harrell's concordance index was 0.70 for internal validation and 0.63 for external validation. This model may provide a clinically useful tool for individualized survival estimation in patients with brain metastases from colorectal cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-22760-2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Brain Metastases and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for survival in patients with brain metastases from colorectal cancer

Jun Imaizumi, Jun Itami, Yukihide Kanemitsu, Issay Kitabayashi et al.
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Brain Metastases and Treatment
1.52
article

Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for survival in patients with brain metastases from colorectal cancer

Jun Imaizumi, Jun Itami, Yukihide Kanemitsu, Issay Kitabayashi, Atsuo Takashima, Hiroshi Igaki, Yasuji Miyakita, Dai Shida, Yoshitaka Narita, Narikazu Boku
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Brain metastases from colorectal cancer are rare but carry a dismal prognosis. This study aimed to develop and externally validate a prognostic model for individualized survival prediction in affected patients. The model was constructed using a training cohort of 112 patients diagnosed with brain metastases after initial colorectal cancer treatment at our institution between 1985 and 2017, and validated in an external cohort of 114 patients referred for brain metastasis treatment between 1987 and 2017. A nomogram was developed incorporating five variables: age, performance status assessed by the Karnofsky Performance Status scale, number of brain metastases, maximum size of brain lesions, and number of prior systemic chemotherapy regimens. In the training cohort, the median survival was 6.6 months, with 1-year and 3-year survival rates of 29.0% and 7.2%. Poorer performance status, multiple metastases, and higher number of chemotherapy regimens were associated with worse prognosis. In the validation cohort, median survival was 5.8 months, with 1-year and 3-year survival rates of 27.0% and 8.4%. Harrell's concordance index was 0.70 for internal validation and 0.63 for external validation. This model may provide a clinically useful tool for individualized survival estimation in patients with brain metastases from colorectal cancer.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Juntendo University (JP), National Cancer Centre Japan (JP), National Cancer Center (US), Shinmatsudo Central General Hospital (JP), National Cancer Research Institute (GB), The University of Tokyo (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Brain Metastases and Treatment
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.