Minimally overlapping technique of bioresorbable scaffolds in a porcine coronary artery model: proof-of-concept study

Overlapping stent placement is a common approach for treating long coronary artery disease, but is associated with increased risks of restenosis and thrombosis. This preliminary study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a minimally overlapping technique using bioresorbable scaffolds (BRSs) compared with the conventional overlapping technique in a porcine coronary artery model. Eight coronary arteries were randomly assigned to two groups. In the overlapping group, two BRSs overlapped by 2.4 mm. In the end-to-end group, both ends of the BRSs were minimally overlapped, guided by balloon and scaffold markers. Lesions were assessed through phantom study, coronary angiography, optical coherence tomography, and histological analysis. Technical success was achieved in both groups. Strut fractures were observed in the overlapping group but not in the end-to-end group. BRS-induced neointimal tissue formation related variables were significantly lower in the end-to-end group (all p < 0.001). Apoptotic cells were significantly reduced in the end-to-end group compared with the conventional overlapping group (p < 0.001). The minimally overlapping technique using BRSs effectively maintained luminal patency and structural integrity for 4 weeks, suggesting that the end-to-end method may be a favorable strategy for treating long diffuse coronary lesions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-22772-y
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Minimally overlapping technique of bioresorbable scaffolds in a porcine coronary artery model: proof-of-concept study

Dong‐Sung Won, Yubeen Park, Do‐Yoon Kang, Jung‐Min Ahn et al.
Scientific Reports
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
article

Minimally overlapping technique of bioresorbable scaffolds in a porcine coronary artery model: proof-of-concept study

Dong‐Sung Won, Yubeen Park, Do‐Yoon Kang, Jung‐Min Ahn, Seung Jin Eo, Ji Won Kim, Jung‐Hoon Park, Song Hee Kim
article en

Abstract

Overlapping stent placement is a common approach for treating long coronary artery disease, but is associated with increased risks of restenosis and thrombosis. This preliminary study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a minimally overlapping technique using bioresorbable scaffolds (BRSs) compared with the conventional overlapping technique in a porcine coronary artery model. Eight coronary arteries were randomly assigned to two groups. In the overlapping group, two BRSs overlapped by 2.4 mm. In the end-to-end group, both ends of the BRSs were minimally overlapped, guided by balloon and scaffold markers. Lesions were assessed through phantom study, coronary angiography, optical coherence tomography, and histological analysis. Technical success was achieved in both groups. Strut fractures were observed in the overlapping group but not in the end-to-end group. BRS-induced neointimal tissue formation related variables were significantly lower in the end-to-end group (all p < 0.001). Apoptotic cells were significantly reduced in the end-to-end group compared with the conventional overlapping group (p < 0.001). The minimally overlapping technique using BRSs effectively maintained luminal patency and structural integrity for 4 weeks, suggesting that the end-to-end method may be a favorable strategy for treating long diffuse coronary lesions.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Ulsan College (KR), Asan Medical Center (KR), University of Ulsan (KR)
Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea, Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.