A data-driven framework for evaluating maintenance crews in fertilizer manufacturing units

This study proposes a comprehensive, data-driven framework for evaluating maintenance crew performance in fertilizer manufacturing units. The framework integrates key performance indicators (KPIs), real-time monitoring, and workforce assessment to enhance operational efficiency and decision-making. Unlike prior research that focuses primarily on AI-driven predictive maintenance and equipment reliability, this study bridges the gap between machine performance and human efficiency. A mixed-methods approach is adopted, combining statistical validation, real-time condition monitoring, and workforce analytics. The study incorporates benchmarking techniques and data from IoT-enabled systems and maintenance logs. Performance evaluation is conducted through a structured scoring system that considers response time, task completion rate, cost adherence, and equipment reliability. Statistical techniques, including paired t-tests, ANOVA, and regression analysis, are used to validate the significance of improvements in maintenance efficiency. The proposed framework enables a holistic evaluation of maintenance crew performance, demonstrating measurable improvements in response time (30.5% reduction in MTTR), cost efficiency (18.4% reduction in CoM), and equipment reliability (25% increase in MTBF). Comparative analysis with approaches such as condition-based maintenance (CBM) and reliability-centered maintenance (RCM) highlights the framework's effectiveness in balancing operational metrics with workforce accountability. The implementation also led to a 6.1% increase in Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE), improving from 77.6 to 83.7%. By integrating workforce assessment with data-driven maintenance practices, this framework provides actionable insights for plant managers aiming to improve reliability, reduce downtime, and optimize maintenance operations. Its modular structure and reliance on real-time monitoring support proactive planning, enhance resource utilization, and improve decision-making. The model is adaptable to sectors such as oil and gas, power generation, and automotive manufacturing. This study introduces a novel, structured evaluation mechanism that complements existing AI-based predictive maintenance tools by incorporating quantitative workforce performance assessment. By aligning human and machine dimensions within a unified evaluation model, the framework addresses key gaps in current maintenance strategies and offers a scalable solution for enhancing operational excellence and industrial reliability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-17418-y
Primary Topic
Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A data-driven framework for evaluating maintenance crews in fertilizer manufacturing units

Prasada Rao Y V S S S V
Scientific Reports
Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
article

A data-driven framework for evaluating maintenance crews in fertilizer manufacturing units

Prasada Rao Y V S S S V
article en

Abstract

This study proposes a comprehensive, data-driven framework for evaluating maintenance crew performance in fertilizer manufacturing units. The framework integrates key performance indicators (KPIs), real-time monitoring, and workforce assessment to enhance operational efficiency and decision-making. Unlike prior research that focuses primarily on AI-driven predictive maintenance and equipment reliability, this study bridges the gap between machine performance and human efficiency. A mixed-methods approach is adopted, combining statistical validation, real-time condition monitoring, and workforce analytics. The study incorporates benchmarking techniques and data from IoT-enabled systems and maintenance logs. Performance evaluation is conducted through a structured scoring system that considers response time, task completion rate, cost adherence, and equipment reliability. Statistical techniques, including paired t-tests, ANOVA, and regression analysis, are used to validate the significance of improvements in maintenance efficiency. The proposed framework enables a holistic evaluation of maintenance crew performance, demonstrating measurable improvements in response time (30.5% reduction in MTTR), cost efficiency (18.4% reduction in CoM), and equipment reliability (25% increase in MTBF). Comparative analysis with approaches such as condition-based maintenance (CBM) and reliability-centered maintenance (RCM) highlights the framework's effectiveness in balancing operational metrics with workforce accountability. The implementation also led to a 6.1% increase in Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE), improving from 77.6 to 83.7%. By integrating workforce assessment with data-driven maintenance practices, this framework provides actionable insights for plant managers aiming to improve reliability, reduce downtime, and optimize maintenance operations. Its modular structure and reliance on real-time monitoring support proactive planning, enhance resource utilization, and improve decision-making. The model is adaptable to sectors such as oil and gas, power generation, and automotive manufacturing. This study introduces a novel, structured evaluation mechanism that complements existing AI-based predictive maintenance tools by incorporating quantitative workforce performance assessment. By aligning human and machine dimensions within a unified evaluation model, the framework addresses key gaps in current maintenance strategies and offers a scalable solution for enhancing operational excellence and industrial reliability.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Chaitanya Bharathi Institute of Technology (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.