Neoadjuvant therapy

Summary Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for early breast cancer was first introduced in the 1980s to downstage large, inoperable tumors, and thereby enable less extensive surgical resections. Beyond its surgical benefits, NAT offers the unique advantage of assessing treatment response in vivo, informing subsequent adjuvant strategies, and—most importantly—improving long-term outcomes. In certain molecular subtypes, NAT can induce high rates of pathologic complete response, offering the possibility of complete eradication and potential cure of early breast cancer. As a result, NAT is now increasingly used even in patients with smaller breast tumors. Over recent decades, the therapeutic landscape has expanded considerably: HER2-targeted agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed the management of HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer, respectively. Moreover, combining chemotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibition appears to significantly increase pathologic complete response rates in patients with high-risk, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer exhibiting high programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. This short review aims to provide an overview of the growing complexity and evolving role of neoadjuvant treatment strategies in early breast cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
memo - Magazine of European Medical Oncology
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12254-025-01079-8
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neoadjuvant therapy

Simon Peter Gampenrieder, Vanessa Castagnaviz
memo - Magazine of European Medical Oncology
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Neoadjuvant therapy

Simon Peter Gampenrieder, Vanessa Castagnaviz
article en

Abstract

Summary Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for early breast cancer was first introduced in the 1980s to downstage large, inoperable tumors, and thereby enable less extensive surgical resections. Beyond its surgical benefits, NAT offers the unique advantage of assessing treatment response in vivo, informing subsequent adjuvant strategies, and—most importantly—improving long-term outcomes. In certain molecular subtypes, NAT can induce high rates of pathologic complete response, offering the possibility of complete eradication and potential cure of early breast cancer. As a result, NAT is now increasingly used even in patients with smaller breast tumors. Over recent decades, the therapeutic landscape has expanded considerably: HER2-targeted agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed the management of HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer, respectively. Moreover, combining chemotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibition appears to significantly increase pathologic complete response rates in patients with high-risk, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer exhibiting high programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. This short review aims to provide an overview of the growing complexity and evolving role of neoadjuvant treatment strategies in early breast cancer.

memo - Magazine of European Medical OncologyVol. 18(4)
Paracelsus Medical University (AT)
Amgen, Eli Lilly and Company, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo Europe
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Neoadjuvant therapy — Simon Peter Gampenrieder, Vanessa Castagnaviz · memo - Magazine of European Medical Oncology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS