On the visibility of artworks and their aesthetic properties: dismissing a perplexity without representationalism

Supported by John McDowell’s conceptualism, Sonia Sedivy develops her conceptual realism as a response to a perplexity she identifies in Arthur C. Danto’s views on the theoretical and historical nature of artworks and their aesthetic properties. Namely, that at least some of these objects and properties are not visible. Considering the connection between the question on the visibility of artworks and their aesthetic properties and the broader issue of aesthetic realism, this paper challenges the assumption that representationalism is the only possible application of the apparatus from philosophy of perception to philosophical aesthetics. Drawing on Charles Travis’s anti-representationalism and Michael Martin’s non-representationalist account of looks, the paper proposes an alternative account of the historical and visible character of at least some aesthetic properties of artworks, one that does not rely on the assumption that they involve representational content.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05782-z
Primary Topic
Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the visibility of artworks and their aesthetic properties: dismissing a perplexity without representationalism

Manuela Teles
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
article

On the visibility of artworks and their aesthetic properties: dismissing a perplexity without representationalism

Manuela Teles
article en

Abstract

Supported by John McDowell’s conceptualism, Sonia Sedivy develops her conceptual realism as a response to a perplexity she identifies in Arthur C. Danto’s views on the theoretical and historical nature of artworks and their aesthetic properties. Namely, that at least some of these objects and properties are not visible. Considering the connection between the question on the visibility of artworks and their aesthetic properties and the broader issue of aesthetic realism, this paper challenges the assumption that representationalism is the only possible application of the apparatus from philosophy of perception to philosophical aesthetics. Drawing on Charles Travis’s anti-representationalism and Michael Martin’s non-representationalist account of looks, the paper proposes an alternative account of the historical and visible character of at least some aesthetic properties of artworks, one that does not rely on the assumption that they involve representational content.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
Film Independent (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.