Validation of the DBP-6279B arm-type fully automatic digital blood pressure monitor in pregnancy according to the ISO 81060-2:2018/AMD 1:2020 protocol

To evaluate the accuracy of the DBP-6279B arm-type fully automatic digital blood pressure monitor in pregnant populations according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018/AMD 1:2020) and the Recognized Consensus Standards published by the Food and Drug Administration (FR Recognized List No.056, FR Recognized No. 3-166), a total of 115 pregnant women were enrolled in this clinical trial. One participant was excluded because it met the data exclusion criteria. The arm circumference and subgroup distributions of the subjects met the requirements of the protocol. According to criterion 1, the mean difference of systolic blood pressure between the test device and the reference device was ‑0.89 mmHg, with a SD of 5.60 mmHg. The mean difference of diastolic blood pressure was ‑0.17 mmHg, with a SD of 4.65 mmHg. The mean difference in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure was less than 5.0 mmHg, and the SD was less than 8.0 mmHg. Additional analyses were also conducted in accordance with criterion 2 and the results met the requirements, too. Therefore, it is recommended for pregnant populations in home and clinical use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood Pressure Monitoring
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/mbp.0000000000000779
Primary Topic
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the DBP-6279B arm-type fully automatic digital blood pressure monitor in pregnancy according to the ISO 81060-2:2018/AMD 1:2020 protocol

Fen Li, Rong Yang
Blood Pressure Monitoring
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
article

Validation of the DBP-6279B arm-type fully automatic digital blood pressure monitor in pregnancy according to the ISO 81060-2:2018/AMD 1:2020 protocol

Fen Li, Rong Yang
article en

Abstract

To evaluate the accuracy of the DBP-6279B arm-type fully automatic digital blood pressure monitor in pregnant populations according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018/AMD 1:2020) and the Recognized Consensus Standards published by the Food and Drug Administration (FR Recognized List No.056, FR Recognized No. 3-166), a total of 115 pregnant women were enrolled in this clinical trial. One participant was excluded because it met the data exclusion criteria. The arm circumference and subgroup distributions of the subjects met the requirements of the protocol. According to criterion 1, the mean difference of systolic blood pressure between the test device and the reference device was ‑0.89 mmHg, with a SD of 5.60 mmHg. The mean difference of diastolic blood pressure was ‑0.17 mmHg, with a SD of 4.65 mmHg. The mean difference in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure was less than 5.0 mmHg, and the SD was less than 8.0 mmHg. Additional analyses were also conducted in accordance with criterion 2 and the results met the requirements, too. Therefore, it is recommended for pregnant populations in home and clinical use.

Blood Pressure MonitoringVol. 31(1)
Handan College (CN), Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Westlake University, School of Medicine (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.