Comparing Sac Embolization and Inferior Mesenteric Artery Embolization in Preventing Type II Endoleaks Post-EVAR
SACE is more effective than IMAE in preventing pT2EL and promoting sac shrinkage in high-risk EVAR patients. These results support SACE as the preferred adjunctive strategy, warranting further multicenter studies with longer follow-up to confirm its benefits and optimize techniques.Clinical ImpactThis study provides comparative evidence on two adjunctive techniques used during EVAR for high-risk patients. Sac embolization (SACE) demonstrated a lower incidence of persistent type II endoleaks and a higher rate of aneurysm sac shrinkage compared with inferior mesenteric artery embolization (IMAE), with reduced contrast use and comparable safety. These findings suggest that SACE may offer a more effective and practical approach for type II endoleak prevention and sac regression, potentially improving long-term outcomes and procedural efficiency in EVAR practice.
Authors
- Jian Fu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8201-9319)
- Hailong Luo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1336-8755)
- Fanyun Liu
- Yuan H. Zhao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5351-502X)
- Yikuan Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0198-7519)
Institutions
- Dalian Medical University (CN)
- Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (CN)
- Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (CN)
- Chongqing Medical University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Endovascular Therapy
- Published
- 2025-11-06
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251388729
- Primary Topic
- Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00