Exposure Variability Between 1‐ or 6‐Minute and 30‐Minute Averaging Time Lengths in Radiofrequency‐Electromagnetic Field Exposure Monitoring

Different averaging time lengths (ATLs) are widely used in radiofrequency-electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure monitoring. This study evaluated variability in RF-EMF exposure associated with the ATLs of 1- and 6-min normalised to 30-min data. For 15 frequency bands of interest, RF-EMF exposures were collected in contiguous 1-min blocks over 30 min at four sites (two outdoor and two indoor). Frequency-band and site-specific variability in exposure between the three ATLs was assessed. First, the variability in terms of relative deviation (in dB) between 1- or 6-min and 30-min were estimated. Second, the overall exposure variability (in μW/m<sup>2</sup>) were compared between 1- or 6-min and 30-min blocks statistically using the quantile regression method. The overall exposure variability on ATL of 1-min or 6-min was considered different to 30-min if a majority of respective sub-pair comparisons across different percentiles (P<sub>5</sub>, P<sub>25</sub>, P<sub>50</sub>, P<sub>75</sub>, P<sub>95</sub>) were significantly different. The study largely showed that the exposure variability (i.e., relative deviation) of different ATLs was within +/- 3 dB. Further, the overall exposure variability between 1- or 6-min and 30-min ATLs showed inconsistent outcomes. Frequency bands of broadcast and most of the mobile services < 2 GHz demonstrated overall similar exposure variability for 1-min and 6-min ATLs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioelectromagnetics
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.70030
Primary Topic
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exposure Variability Between 1‐ or 6‐Minute and 30‐Minute Averaging Time Lengths in Radiofrequency‐Electromagnetic Field Exposure Monitoring

Chhavi Raj Bhatt, Stuart Henderson, Sarah Loughran, Masoumeh Sanagou
Bioelectromagnetics
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
article

Exposure Variability Between 1‐ or 6‐Minute and 30‐Minute Averaging Time Lengths in Radiofrequency‐Electromagnetic Field Exposure Monitoring

Chhavi Raj Bhatt, Stuart Henderson, Sarah Loughran, Masoumeh Sanagou
article en

Abstract

Different averaging time lengths (ATLs) are widely used in radiofrequency-electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure monitoring. This study evaluated variability in RF-EMF exposure associated with the ATLs of 1- and 6-min normalised to 30-min data. For 15 frequency bands of interest, RF-EMF exposures were collected in contiguous 1-min blocks over 30 min at four sites (two outdoor and two indoor). Frequency-band and site-specific variability in exposure between the three ATLs was assessed. First, the variability in terms of relative deviation (in dB) between 1- or 6-min and 30-min were estimated. Second, the overall exposure variability (in μW/m<sup>2</sup>) were compared between 1- or 6-min and 30-min blocks statistically using the quantile regression method. The overall exposure variability on ATL of 1-min or 6-min was considered different to 30-min if a majority of respective sub-pair comparisons across different percentiles (P<sub>5</sub>, P<sub>25</sub>, P<sub>50</sub>, P<sub>75</sub>, P<sub>95</sub>) were significantly different. The study largely showed that the exposure variability (i.e., relative deviation) of different ATLs was within +/- 3 dB. Further, the overall exposure variability between 1- or 6-min and 30-min ATLs showed inconsistent outcomes. Frequency bands of broadcast and most of the mobile services < 2 GHz demonstrated overall similar exposure variability for 1-min and 6-min ATLs.

BioelectromagneticsVol. 46(8)
Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.