Exposure Variability Between 1‐ or 6‐Minute and 30‐Minute Averaging Time Lengths in Radiofrequency‐Electromagnetic Field Exposure Monitoring
Different averaging time lengths (ATLs) are widely used in radiofrequency-electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure monitoring. This study evaluated variability in RF-EMF exposure associated with the ATLs of 1- and 6-min normalised to 30-min data. For 15 frequency bands of interest, RF-EMF exposures were collected in contiguous 1-min blocks over 30 min at four sites (two outdoor and two indoor). Frequency-band and site-specific variability in exposure between the three ATLs was assessed. First, the variability in terms of relative deviation (in dB) between 1- or 6-min and 30-min were estimated. Second, the overall exposure variability (in μW/m<sup>2</sup>) were compared between 1- or 6-min and 30-min blocks statistically using the quantile regression method. The overall exposure variability on ATL of 1-min or 6-min was considered different to 30-min if a majority of respective sub-pair comparisons across different percentiles (P<sub>5</sub>, P<sub>25</sub>, P<sub>50</sub>, P<sub>75</sub>, P<sub>95</sub>) were significantly different. The study largely showed that the exposure variability (i.e., relative deviation) of different ATLs was within +/- 3 dB. Further, the overall exposure variability between 1- or 6-min and 30-min ATLs showed inconsistent outcomes. Frequency bands of broadcast and most of the mobile services < 2 GHz demonstrated overall similar exposure variability for 1-min and 6-min ATLs.
Authors
- Chhavi Raj Bhatt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6693-8443)
- Stuart Henderson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9147-5727)
- Sarah Loughran (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3438-3914)
- Masoumeh Sanagou
Institutions
- Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency
Publication Details
- Journal
- Bioelectromagnetics
- Published
- 2025-11-06
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.70030
- Primary Topic
- Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00