Sex differences in inappropriate imaging requests: insights from the Medical Imaging Decision And Support (MIDAS) study
Question Inappropriate diagnostic imaging incurs radiation exposure and costs. Sex-based disparities in this context are understudied; do inappropriate imaging requests differ between men and women? Findings Among 61,220 requests, inappropriate orders were significantly higher in women (7.32%) than in men (6.08%). Clinical relevance Our results suggest sex differences in diagnostic decision-making. Further research and sex- and gender-sensitive approaches in guideline development are needed to ensure equitable imaging practices.
Authors
- Stijntje Dijk (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2905-4128)
- M. G. Myriam Hunink (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2942-2798)
- Thomas Kröncke (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4889-1036)
- Claudia Wollny
Institutions
- Harvard University (US)
- University of Augsburg (DE)
- Erasmus MC (NL)
- University Hospital Augsburg (DE)
- Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- European Radiology
- Published
- 2025-11-06
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-12088-w
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Radiation Dose and Imaging
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.08