Particulate-bound phthalates as blind spot pollutant in air quality monitoring

Particulate-bound phthalates (PBP) are often believed to be proportional to the concentration of particulate matter (PM2.5). However, this belief may be misguided. Phthalates are well-known endocrine disruptors and they are regulated as water and foodborne contaminants. However, airborne phthalates, particularly PBP, have become monitoring and regulatory blind spots. We conducted a sampling campaign across five cities, Ulaanbaatar, Beijing, Seoul, Seosan, and Noto in the Northeast Asian region, and obtained counter-intuitive results. Our findings showed that elevated PM2.5 levels do not necessarily correspond to elevated PBP levels. Beijing and Ulaanbaatar had similarly high PM2.5 levels (18.67 and 18.69 μg/m3, respectively), whereas Ulaanbaatar had a much lower total PBP concentration (1.98 ± 0.65 ng/m3) compared to Beijing (101.94 ± 62.52 ng/m3). The correlation between PM2.5 and total PBP concentration among the five cities was weak (R2 = 0.223). Interestingly, elevated PBP levels appeared to be more closely correlated with the quantity of plastic waste generated in the country. China generates approximately five times more plastic waste than Mongolia. The correlation between plastic waste and the total PBP concentration was strong (R2 = 0.945). This suggests that PBP are blind spot pollutants where their exposure could be misinterpreted by the overall PM2.5 presence.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Engineering Research
Published
2025-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2025.479
Primary Topic
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Particulate-bound phthalates as blind spot pollutant in air quality monitoring

Minjung Song, Kyoung‐Soon Jang, Beelee Chua, Atsushi Matsuki et al.
Environmental Engineering Research
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
article

Particulate-bound phthalates as blind spot pollutant in air quality monitoring

Minjung Song, Kyoung‐Soon Jang, Beelee Chua, Atsushi Matsuki, Changhyuk Kim, Amgalan Natsagdorj, Zhijun Wu, Ning Tang, Ahjeong Son, Ji Yi Lee, Eunsol Heo
article en

Abstract

Particulate-bound phthalates (PBP) are often believed to be proportional to the concentration of particulate matter (PM2.5). However, this belief may be misguided. Phthalates are well-known endocrine disruptors and they are regulated as water and foodborne contaminants. However, airborne phthalates, particularly PBP, have become monitoring and regulatory blind spots. We conducted a sampling campaign across five cities, Ulaanbaatar, Beijing, Seoul, Seosan, and Noto in the Northeast Asian region, and obtained counter-intuitive results. Our findings showed that elevated PM2.5 levels do not necessarily correspond to elevated PBP levels. Beijing and Ulaanbaatar had similarly high PM2.5 levels (18.67 and 18.69 μg/m3, respectively), whereas Ulaanbaatar had a much lower total PBP concentration (1.98 ± 0.65 ng/m3) compared to Beijing (101.94 ± 62.52 ng/m3). The correlation between PM2.5 and total PBP concentration among the five cities was weak (R2 = 0.223). Interestingly, elevated PBP levels appeared to be more closely correlated with the quantity of plastic waste generated in the country. China generates approximately five times more plastic waste than Mongolia. The correlation between plastic waste and the total PBP concentration was strong (R2 = 0.945). This suggests that PBP are blind spot pollutants where their exposure could be misinterpreted by the overall PM2.5 presence.

Environmental Engineering ResearchVol. 31(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.