“I” in research integrity: Introducing art session into research integrity course

<ns3:p>Background Traditional instruction in rules and system of research conduct cannot capture the unique and complex situations involved in ethics choices and actions, but engagement with art may facilitate deeper understanding and discussion of these issues. In this case study, we explored the value of an art exercise incorporated into research integrity (RI) training based on the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity, including research misconduct. Methods At the end of a summer school on responsible research, we held an art session where the participants, all of whom are also authors of this article, painted a picture to illustrate their perspective on research integrity. They also completed a demographic data survey and provided a short description for their painting. We qualitatively analysed the motives of the drawings and quantitatively analysed the sentiment of the essays corresponding to the paintings Results Most authors came from biomedical sciences and were academic researchers, predominantly women (13 out of 19 participants). The titles of paintings ranged from ambiguous (e.g., “Circles” or “Equilibrium”) to more specific (e.g., “The temptation of image manipulation”). Some paintings were abstract, while others fit the representational art framework. Several paintings depicted research graphs and images, while others depicted themes from nature – flowers, beaches, and trees. Motives of conflict and balance were frequent. In the descriptions of the paintings, authors associated their paintings with classical research integrity themes such as morality, transparency, and data manipulation, as well as with personal experiences with research integrity dilemmas. The sentiment of the text was predominantly positive and trusting. Conclusion Using art in teaching research integrity may be a good way to stimulate introspection and discussion about research integrity, as well as to improve understanding of how researchers perceive the concept of research integrity.</ns3:p>

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Open Research Europe
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.21068.2
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“I” in research integrity: Introducing art session into research integrity course

Ivan Buljan, Rafaelly Stavale, Maja Gligora Marković, Anna Catharina Vieira Armond et al.
Open Research Europe
Academic integrity and plagiarism
article

“I” in research integrity: Introducing art session into research integrity course

Ivan Buljan, Rafaelly Stavale, Maja Gligora Marković, Anna Catharina Vieira Armond, Sandra Kostić, Marija Franka Žuljević, Danijel Gudelj, Vanja Pupovac, Ana Marušić, Rea Roje, Marin Viđak, Ružica Tokalić, Stjepan Ljudevit Marušić, Benjamin Benzon, Dina Šimunović, Vicko Tomić, Anita Lunić, Tamara Radojčić, Eli Marušić
article en

Abstract

<ns3:p>Background Traditional instruction in rules and system of research conduct cannot capture the unique and complex situations involved in ethics choices and actions, but engagement with art may facilitate deeper understanding and discussion of these issues. In this case study, we explored the value of an art exercise incorporated into research integrity (RI) training based on the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity, including research misconduct. Methods At the end of a summer school on responsible research, we held an art session where the participants, all of whom are also authors of this article, painted a picture to illustrate their perspective on research integrity. They also completed a demographic data survey and provided a short description for their painting. We qualitatively analysed the motives of the drawings and quantitatively analysed the sentiment of the essays corresponding to the paintings Results Most authors came from biomedical sciences and were academic researchers, predominantly women (13 out of 19 participants). The titles of paintings ranged from ambiguous (e.g., “Circles” or “Equilibrium”) to more specific (e.g., “The temptation of image manipulation”). Some paintings were abstract, while others fit the representational art framework. Several paintings depicted research graphs and images, while others depicted themes from nature – flowers, beaches, and trees. Motives of conflict and balance were frequent. In the descriptions of the paintings, authors associated their paintings with classical research integrity themes such as morality, transparency, and data manipulation, as well as with personal experiences with research integrity dilemmas. The sentiment of the text was predominantly positive and trusting. Conclusion Using art in teaching research integrity may be a good way to stimulate introspection and discussion about research integrity, as well as to improve understanding of how researchers perceive the concept of research integrity.</ns3:p>

Open Research EuropeVol. 5
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.