Switchgrass ( <i>Panicum Virgatum</i> ) and Miscanthus ( <i>Miscanthus</i> × <i>Giganteus</i> ) Long‐Term Yield Patterns Reveal Consistent Productivity Declines

ABSTRACT Perennial grasses like switchgrass ( Panicum virgatum ) and miscanthus ( Miscanthus × giganteus ) are expected to supply a substantial amount of the United States bioeconomy's feedstock demand. However, uncertainties around their long‐term yields challenge the viability of their potential and limit their wider adoption. To resolve their long‐term yield patterns, we analyzed over 200 plantings of switchgrass and miscanthus across Michigan and Wisconsin, USA, measured over 5–15 years. We found a consistent two‐phase long‐term yield dynamic; during a yield‐building phase , peak yields occurred within 4–5 years after planting, followed by a yield‐decline phase in which switchgrass and miscanthus lost 30%–47% and 14%–40% of peak yields, respectively. Among the potential drivers of this dynamic and the yield decline, we found that weather conditions had little impact, as the variation across years was not large enough to drive the observed yield differences. Added nitrogen increased peak yields by 10%–20% and attenuated the yield decline by 20%–50%. However, since fertilized stands still showed a yield decline, other factors became limiting as stands aged. This conserved long‐term yield dynamic has direct implications on management. A farm‐to‐gate economic analysis suggests replanting switchgrass and miscanthus 5 and 9 years following their peak yields maximizes profit over a 30‐year time horizon. Results call for further management and breeding strategies to mitigate the yield‐decline phase, and for reparameterization of global bioenergy models with carbon capture and storage, which may overestimate yields and the economic and environmental benefits of crops grown for bioenergy feedstocks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GCB Bioenergy
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.70088
Primary Topic
Bioenergy crop production and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Switchgrass ( Panicum Virgatum ) and Miscanthus ( Miscanthus × Giganteus ) Long‐Term Yield Patterns Reveal Consistent Productivity Declines

Berkley J. Walker, Molly Sears, Mauricio Tejera‐Nieves, Kurt D. Thelen et al.
GCB Bioenergy
Bioenergy crop production and management
article

Switchgrass ( Panicum Virgatum ) and Miscanthus ( Miscanthus × Giganteus ) Long‐Term Yield Patterns Reveal Consistent Productivity Declines

Berkley J. Walker, Molly Sears, Mauricio Tejera‐Nieves, Kurt D. Thelen, G. Philip Robertson, S. Carolina Córdova
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Perennial grasses like switchgrass ( Panicum virgatum ) and miscanthus ( Miscanthus × giganteus ) are expected to supply a substantial amount of the United States bioeconomy's feedstock demand. However, uncertainties around their long‐term yields challenge the viability of their potential and limit their wider adoption. To resolve their long‐term yield patterns, we analyzed over 200 plantings of switchgrass and miscanthus across Michigan and Wisconsin, USA, measured over 5–15 years. We found a consistent two‐phase long‐term yield dynamic; during a yield‐building phase , peak yields occurred within 4–5 years after planting, followed by a yield‐decline phase in which switchgrass and miscanthus lost 30%–47% and 14%–40% of peak yields, respectively. Among the potential drivers of this dynamic and the yield decline, we found that weather conditions had little impact, as the variation across years was not large enough to drive the observed yield differences. Added nitrogen increased peak yields by 10%–20% and attenuated the yield decline by 20%–50%. However, since fertilized stands still showed a yield decline, other factors became limiting as stands aged. This conserved long‐term yield dynamic has direct implications on management. A farm‐to‐gate economic analysis suggests replanting switchgrass and miscanthus 5 and 9 years following their peak yields maximizes profit over a 30‐year time horizon. Results call for further management and breeding strategies to mitigate the yield‐decline phase, and for reparameterization of global bioenergy models with carbon capture and storage, which may overestimate yields and the economic and environmental benefits of crops grown for bioenergy feedstocks.

GCB BioenergyVol. 17(12)
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US), Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (US), Noldus Information Technology (NL), Michigan State University (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy, Michigan State University, Office of Science, College of Engineering, Michigan State University, Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Biological and Environmental Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Bioenergy crop production and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.