Rockburst multi-factor coupling prediction and quantitative analysis of influencing Factors’ SHAP values based on TPE-FDM-XGBoost model

Accurately predicting rockburst and clarifying its influencing factors is a crucial support for ensuring the safe and efficient construction of underground projects, deepening the theory of geological disasters, and promoting engineering technology innovation. It has an irreplaceable value in fields such as underground resource development and transportation infrastructure construction. This research conducts multi − dimensional explorations around rockburst prediction. Based on the XGBoost integrated learning algorithm, a TPE-FDM-XGBoost model is constructed, by combining feature derivation model (FDM) and tree-structured Parzen estimator (TPE), the rockburst grades of 301 rockburst events are predicted. At the same time, the Shapley Additive explained (SHAP) analysis is comprehensively used to reveal the feature contribution mechanism, and the model prediction logic and key factors are deeply analyzed. The results show that through FDM and TPE, the Accuracy and F1 Score of the TPE-FDM-XGBoost model for rockburst category prediction are 0.9836 and 0.9834 respectively, which are far better than 0.6066 and 0.6090 of the basic XGBoost model. The collaboration of FDM and TPE realizes the dual gains of data dimension increase and model tuning, significantly improving the model generalization ability and stability. Through collaborative FDM, a cross-scale prediction framework of “data driven-mechanism constrained” is constructed, upgrading single mechanical and energy features to multi-factor coupling indicators. The SHAP analysis clarifies that the σ θ stress, w et elastic energy index and their synergistic feature Feature3 (σ θ × w et ) are the key factors for prediction. The synergy of high σ θ and high w et is the key triggering factor for intense rockburst, while the combination of low feature values is an important basis for judging No rockburst. The quantitative analysis of SHAP values effectively captures the collaborative mechanism from rockburst stress triggering to energy release, clearly presenting the continuous evolution process of rockburst risk from stability to out-of-control driven by the change of feature values, connecting the data-driven model with the physical mechanism of rockburst occurrence. The combination of feature engineering and physical meaning is the key direction to further improve the model performance and interpretability, providing precise guidance for the accurate prevention and control of rockburst and practical engineering applications such as rockburst prevention and control in mines and tunnels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ain Shams Engineering Journal
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2025.103859
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rockburst multi-factor coupling prediction and quantitative analysis of influencing Factors’ SHAP values based on TPE-FDM-XGBoost model

Chao Peng, Wanrong Liu, Miao Liu, Xiaotong Du et al.
2 citations
Ain Shams Engineering Journal
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
1.73
article

Rockburst multi-factor coupling prediction and quantitative analysis of influencing Factors’ SHAP values based on TPE-FDM-XGBoost model

Chao Peng, Wanrong Liu, Miao Liu, Xiaotong Du, Xiao Wang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Accurately predicting rockburst and clarifying its influencing factors is a crucial support for ensuring the safe and efficient construction of underground projects, deepening the theory of geological disasters, and promoting engineering technology innovation. It has an irreplaceable value in fields such as underground resource development and transportation infrastructure construction. This research conducts multi − dimensional explorations around rockburst prediction. Based on the XGBoost integrated learning algorithm, a TPE-FDM-XGBoost model is constructed, by combining feature derivation model (FDM) and tree-structured Parzen estimator (TPE), the rockburst grades of 301 rockburst events are predicted. At the same time, the Shapley Additive explained (SHAP) analysis is comprehensively used to reveal the feature contribution mechanism, and the model prediction logic and key factors are deeply analyzed. The results show that through FDM and TPE, the Accuracy and F1 Score of the TPE-FDM-XGBoost model for rockburst category prediction are 0.9836 and 0.9834 respectively, which are far better than 0.6066 and 0.6090 of the basic XGBoost model. The collaboration of FDM and TPE realizes the dual gains of data dimension increase and model tuning, significantly improving the model generalization ability and stability. Through collaborative FDM, a cross-scale prediction framework of “data driven-mechanism constrained” is constructed, upgrading single mechanical and energy features to multi-factor coupling indicators. The SHAP analysis clarifies that the σ θ stress, w et elastic energy index and their synergistic feature Feature3 (σ θ × w et ) are the key factors for prediction. The synergy of high σ θ and high w et is the key triggering factor for intense rockburst, while the combination of low feature values is an important basis for judging No rockburst. The quantitative analysis of SHAP values effectively captures the collaborative mechanism from rockburst stress triggering to energy release, clearly presenting the continuous evolution process of rockburst risk from stability to out-of-control driven by the change of feature values, connecting the data-driven model with the physical mechanism of rockburst occurrence. The combination of feature engineering and physical meaning is the key direction to further improve the model performance and interpretability, providing precise guidance for the accurate prevention and control of rockburst and practical engineering applications such as rockburst prevention and control in mines and tunnels.

Ain Shams Engineering JournalVol. 17(1)
Liaocheng University (CN), China State Construction Engineering (China) (CN), CCFEB Industrial Equipment Installation (China) (CN), Shandong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Rock Mechanics and Modeling
1.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.