AEGFN: adaptive evidence-gated fusion network for medical image prediction via conflict compensation and DS evidence theory-driven regularization

The discrepancy in reliability and evidence conflict in multimodal data fusion for medical image prediction significantly undermines the accuracy of clinical decision-making. To address this challenge, we propose an Adaptive Evidence-Gated Fusion Network (AEGFN) based on Dempster-Shafer (DS) evidence theory. This framework models the evidence quality and cognitive uncertainty of CT images, image sequences, and clinical data using the Dirichlet distribution. We innovatively introduce an Evidence-Attention Gate (EAG) to dynamically adjust fusion weights for high-conflict modalities (conflict > 0.6), enabling conflict-aware uncertainty compensation. Additionally, a hybrid loss function combining KL divergence regularization with uncertainty-weighted cross-entropy is designed to balance model confidence and generalization. Evaluated on colorectal cancer (656 cases) and radiation pneumonitis (117 cases) datasets for binary classification tasks (predicting patient death and predicting RP occurrence), AEGFN achieves classification accuracies of 95.04% (AUC 0.97) and 82.34% (AUC 0.8312), outperforming the state-of-the-art method DDEF by 0.66% and 1.94%, respectively. This work provides a robust and interpretable solution for multimodal medical prediction, enhancing the reliability of clinical decision support systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ae183b
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AEGFN: adaptive evidence-gated fusion network for medical image prediction via conflict compensation and DS evidence theory-driven regularization

Ronghua Liang, Xueping Tan, Shudong Hu, Dinghui Wu et al.
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

AEGFN: adaptive evidence-gated fusion network for medical image prediction via conflict compensation and DS evidence theory-driven regularization

Ronghua Liang, Xueping Tan, Shudong Hu, Dinghui Wu, Hao Wang, Yuxi Ge
article en

Abstract

The discrepancy in reliability and evidence conflict in multimodal data fusion for medical image prediction significantly undermines the accuracy of clinical decision-making. To address this challenge, we propose an Adaptive Evidence-Gated Fusion Network (AEGFN) based on Dempster-Shafer (DS) evidence theory. This framework models the evidence quality and cognitive uncertainty of CT images, image sequences, and clinical data using the Dirichlet distribution. We innovatively introduce an Evidence-Attention Gate (EAG) to dynamically adjust fusion weights for high-conflict modalities (conflict > 0.6), enabling conflict-aware uncertainty compensation. Additionally, a hybrid loss function combining KL divergence regularization with uncertainty-weighted cross-entropy is designed to balance model confidence and generalization. Evaluated on colorectal cancer (656 cases) and radiation pneumonitis (117 cases) datasets for binary classification tasks (predicting patient death and predicting RP occurrence), AEGFN achieves classification accuracies of 95.04% (AUC 0.97) and 82.34% (AUC 0.8312), outperforming the state-of-the-art method DDEF by 0.66% and 1.94%, respectively. This work provides a robust and interpretable solution for multimodal medical prediction, enhancing the reliability of clinical decision support systems.

Biomedical Physics & Engineering ExpressVol. 11(6)
Jiangnan University (CN), Soochow University (CN), Wuxi Fourth People's Hospital (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.