Smoking and risk perception of natural and biological hazards: Challenging risk classification in public health

Understanding how individuals perceive risks of natural and health hazards can improve risk communication. This study aimed to investigate perceptions of natural and biological hazards among smokers and non-smokers, using smoking as a proxy for risk-taking propensity. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Italy and Sweden in August 2021 with representative samples (<i>n</i> = 4,131). Risk perception across seven hazards was measured using Likert scales. Ordinal logistic regression was used to assess associations between smoking and risk perception, stratified by country and adjusted for sociodemographic confounders. Smoking prevalence was higher in Italy (32.7%) than Sweden (8.8%). In Italy, smokers, particularly moderate-heavy smokers, perceived higher hazard risks than non-smokers. No such pattern was found in Sweden. Contrary to the initial hypothesis, smoking was associated with heightened risk perception in Italy. This study challenges traditional categorizations of risk-seeking versus risk-averse individuals, emphasizing the complex interplay of individual behaviors, perceptions, and societal norms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
iScience
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2025.113962
Primary Topic
Risk Perception and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Smoking and risk perception of natural and biological hazards: Challenging risk classification in public health

Elena Raffetti, Marcus R. Munafò, Giorgio Tiecco, Giuliano Di Baldassarre et al.
iScience
Risk Perception and Management
article

Smoking and risk perception of natural and biological hazards: Challenging risk classification in public health

Elena Raffetti, Marcus R. Munafò, Giorgio Tiecco, Giuliano Di Baldassarre, Gianmarco Pignocchino, Blanca Paniello-Castillo, Jasmine Khouja, Maria Rosaria Galanti
article en

Abstract

Understanding how individuals perceive risks of natural and health hazards can improve risk communication. This study aimed to investigate perceptions of natural and biological hazards among smokers and non-smokers, using smoking as a proxy for risk-taking propensity. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Italy and Sweden in August 2021 with representative samples (<i>n</i> = 4,131). Risk perception across seven hazards was measured using Likert scales. Ordinal logistic regression was used to assess associations between smoking and risk perception, stratified by country and adjusted for sociodemographic confounders. Smoking prevalence was higher in Italy (32.7%) than Sweden (8.8%). In Italy, smokers, particularly moderate-heavy smokers, perceived higher hazard risks than non-smokers. No such pattern was found in Sweden. Contrary to the initial hypothesis, smoking was associated with heightened risk perception in Italy. This study challenges traditional categorizations of risk-seeking versus risk-averse individuals, emphasizing the complex interplay of individual behaviors, perceptions, and societal norms.

iScienceVol. 28(12)
Uppsala University (SE), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), University of Cambridge (GB), Karolinska Institutet (SE), British Heart Foundation (GB), University of Bristol (GB), Fincons Group (Italy) (IT), Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia (IT), Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ES), Centre of Natural Hazards and Disaster Science (SE), University of Brescia (IT)
Centres de Recerca de Catalunya, European Commission, Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas, Generalitat de Catalunya, Karolinska Institutet, Vetenskapsrådet, Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd, Centrum för naturkatastrofslära, Uppsala Universitet, Medical Research Council, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Risk Perception and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.