Comparison of the Core Training and Mobility Training Effects on Basketball Athletic Performance in Young Players: A Comparative Experimental Study

This study compared the effects of core (CTG) or mobility training (MTG) on basketball-specific skills in youth players, focusing on dynamic balance. Both training modalities have a recognized role in enhancing performance, but few studies have examined their impact on this population. Thirty-one young (age 14.71 ± 2.27 years) males were assigned to an 8-week CTG or MTG. Overhead Squat, Y-Balance Test, Agility T-Test, Sit-and-Reach, Functional Hop Tests, and the Balance Error Scoring System were assessed before (pre) and after (post) the intervention for both dominant (D) and non-dominant (ND) limbs. Both groups improved the postero-lateral direction of the Y-Balance Test for the D (CTG, MD [95% CIs] = -8.108 [-15.620, -0.595], <i>p</i> = 0.035; MTG, MD [95% CIs] = -15.234 [-23.512, -6.956], <i>p</i> = 0.024) and ND (CTG, MD [95% CIs] = -9.110 [-16.150, -2.070], <i>p</i> = 0.013; MTG MD [95% CIs] = -13.899 [-21.657, -6.141], <i>p</i> = 0.001) limb and the medial reach for D (CTG, MD [95% CIs] = -17.279 [-26.364, -8.194], <i>p</i> = 0.001; MTG, MD [95% CIs] = -22.050 [-32.061, -12.039], <i>p</i> = 0.03) and ND (CTG, MD [95% CIs] = -9.309 [-17.093, -1.526], <i>p</i> = 0.021; MTG, MD [95% CIs] = -13.614 [-22.190, -5.037], <i>p</i> = 0.003), the Overhead Squat Test (CTG, MD [95% CIs] = -3.059 [-3.797, -2.321], <i>p</i> = 0.001; MTG, MD [95% CIs] = -3.643 [-4.456, -2.830], <i>p</i> = 0.001), and Agility T-Test (CTG, MD [95% CIs] = 0.572 [0.072, 1.073], <i>p</i> = 0.026; MTG, MD [95% CIs] = 0.696 [0.145, 1.248], <i>p</i> = 0.024) skills. Only CTG showed a significant improvement (MD [95% CIs] = -8.294 [-16.162, -0.426], <i>p</i> = 0.04) in single-leg hop performance for the ND limb. No significant improvements were observed in static balance or flexibility. No time × group effect was found. Both interventions improved key basketball-specific motor abilities and could be added to the basketball training session without adverse effect.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sports
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sports13110398
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the Core Training and Mobility Training Effects on Basketball Athletic Performance in Young Players: A Comparative Experimental Study

Maria Politi, Maria Rosaria Tropea, Alessandra Amato, Giuseppe Musumeci et al.
Sports
Sports Performance and Training
article

Comparison of the Core Training and Mobility Training Effects on Basketball Athletic Performance in Young Players: A Comparative Experimental Study

Maria Politi, Maria Rosaria Tropea, Alessandra Amato, Giuseppe Musumeci, Andrea Fusco, Cristina Cortis
article en

Abstract

This study compared the effects of core (CTG) or mobility training (MTG) on basketball-specific skills in youth players, focusing on dynamic balance. Both training modalities have a recognized role in enhancing performance, but few studies have examined their impact on this population. Thirty-one young (age 14.71 ± 2.27 years) males were assigned to an 8-week CTG or MTG. Overhead Squat, Y-Balance Test, Agility T-Test, Sit-and-Reach, Functional Hop Tests, and the Balance Error Scoring System were assessed before (pre) and after (post) the intervention for both dominant (D) and non-dominant (ND) limbs. Both groups improved the postero-lateral direction of the Y-Balance Test for the D (CTG, MD [95% CIs] = -8.108 [-15.620, -0.595], <i>p</i> = 0.035; MTG, MD [95% CIs] = -15.234 [-23.512, -6.956], <i>p</i> = 0.024) and ND (CTG, MD [95% CIs] = -9.110 [-16.150, -2.070], <i>p</i> = 0.013; MTG MD [95% CIs] = -13.899 [-21.657, -6.141], <i>p</i> = 0.001) limb and the medial reach for D (CTG, MD [95% CIs] = -17.279 [-26.364, -8.194], <i>p</i> = 0.001; MTG, MD [95% CIs] = -22.050 [-32.061, -12.039], <i>p</i> = 0.03) and ND (CTG, MD [95% CIs] = -9.309 [-17.093, -1.526], <i>p</i> = 0.021; MTG, MD [95% CIs] = -13.614 [-22.190, -5.037], <i>p</i> = 0.003), the Overhead Squat Test (CTG, MD [95% CIs] = -3.059 [-3.797, -2.321], <i>p</i> = 0.001; MTG, MD [95% CIs] = -3.643 [-4.456, -2.830], <i>p</i> = 0.001), and Agility T-Test (CTG, MD [95% CIs] = 0.572 [0.072, 1.073], <i>p</i> = 0.026; MTG, MD [95% CIs] = 0.696 [0.145, 1.248], <i>p</i> = 0.024) skills. Only CTG showed a significant improvement (MD [95% CIs] = -8.294 [-16.162, -0.426], <i>p</i> = 0.04) in single-leg hop performance for the ND limb. No significant improvements were observed in static balance or flexibility. No time × group effect was found. Both interventions improved key basketball-specific motor abilities and could be added to the basketball training session without adverse effect.

SportsVol. 13(11)
Università degli studi di Cassino e del Lazio Meridionale (IT), University of Catania (IT), University of Chieti-Pescara (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.