High‐Resolution Regional Seismic Loss Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Bridges Using Component‐Level Fragility Models and Repair Cost Estimations

ABSTRACT This study develops a high‐resolution regional seismic loss assessment framework for reinforced concrete (RC) bridges, focusing on direct losses due to bridge repair and replacement. Indirect losses tied to traffic downtime, business disruption, delayed recovery, etc., can also be attributed to bridge damage but are considered outside the current scope. While previous studies have made relevant attempts on regional bridge seismic loss assessment, most relied on limited hazard simulations, simplified fragility models, and generic repair cost ratios. In contrast, the current study bears its novel contribution to conduct high‐resolution assessment that directly aggregates loss contributions from individual bridge components. Using 1152 RC bridges in the City of Los Angeles as a case study, the framework integrates crucial steps that (1) generate numerous seismic intensity maps, (2) classify the inventory into 26 bridge groups, (3) assign each bridge group with second‐generation seismic fragility models, and (4) develop a stochastic loss function for each bridge through component‐level cost estimations. The high‐resolution assessment enables new insights for more in‐depth loss disaggregation analysis across varying return periods, individual bridges, bridge components, and repair actions. Research findings for LA bridges indicate that early‐designed, multi‐span bridges contribute disproportionately to the overall regional losses. The framework also supports detailed sensitivity analysis toward explicit loss uncertainty quantification. Overall, the proposed high‐resolution assessment framework enhances the fidelity, interpretability, and actionability of regional loss results, offering a transferable and scalable methodology for more effective seismic loss mitigation and post‐earthquake recovery planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.70083
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High‐Resolution Regional Seismic Loss Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Bridges Using Component‐Level Fragility Models and Repair Cost Estimations

Henry V. Burton, Jamie Ellen Padgett, Chenhao Wu, Yazhou Xie et al.
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Seismic Performance and Analysis
article

High‐Resolution Regional Seismic Loss Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Bridges Using Component‐Level Fragility Models and Repair Cost Estimations

Henry V. Burton, Jamie Ellen Padgett, Chenhao Wu, Yazhou Xie, Shanshan Chen
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study develops a high‐resolution regional seismic loss assessment framework for reinforced concrete (RC) bridges, focusing on direct losses due to bridge repair and replacement. Indirect losses tied to traffic downtime, business disruption, delayed recovery, etc., can also be attributed to bridge damage but are considered outside the current scope. While previous studies have made relevant attempts on regional bridge seismic loss assessment, most relied on limited hazard simulations, simplified fragility models, and generic repair cost ratios. In contrast, the current study bears its novel contribution to conduct high‐resolution assessment that directly aggregates loss contributions from individual bridge components. Using 1152 RC bridges in the City of Los Angeles as a case study, the framework integrates crucial steps that (1) generate numerous seismic intensity maps, (2) classify the inventory into 26 bridge groups, (3) assign each bridge group with second‐generation seismic fragility models, and (4) develop a stochastic loss function for each bridge through component‐level cost estimations. The high‐resolution assessment enables new insights for more in‐depth loss disaggregation analysis across varying return periods, individual bridges, bridge components, and repair actions. Research findings for LA bridges indicate that early‐designed, multi‐span bridges contribute disproportionately to the overall regional losses. The framework also supports detailed sensitivity analysis toward explicit loss uncertainty quantification. Overall, the proposed high‐resolution assessment framework enhances the fidelity, interpretability, and actionability of regional loss results, offering a transferable and scalable methodology for more effective seismic loss mitigation and post‐earthquake recovery planning.

Earthquake Engineering & Structural DynamicsVol. 55(2)
University of California, Los Angeles (US), McGill University (CA), Rice University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.