Technology-enhanced “GipSci” approach in developing contexts performs well at <i>interest</i> and <i>curiosity</i> , yet, needs reinforcing at <i>inquiry</i> level

Numerous studies explore inquiry in science centers, but technology-enhanced science centers’ (TeSC) curricula remain relatively nascent. This mixed-methods study explores how the GiPSci model, a technology-enhanced science center program developed in-house by curriculum experts, supports learners’ inquiry skills aligned with international standards. Data were collected through learners’ products (n = 161), lesson observations (n = 20), train-the-trainer activities (n = 405), expert evaluations (n = 14), and interviews with trainers (n = 10). Findings reveal curiosity and interest scored higher than inquiry, highlighting the challenges of inquiry in tech-enhanced settings. Consensus among trainers, observations, and learners’ products points to gaps in fostering inquiry skills in the TeSC program. To enhance GiPSci-like models, collaboration among program designers, trainers, and train-the-trainer providers is essential to better align the technology-enhanced science centers’ program with inquiry-based learning.