Deglobalisation? The case for diversified and decentralised global sustainability science

Abstract Non-technical summary Recent geopolitical events remind us of the need for a resilient, global approach to sustainability science. This Commentary argues that a diverse, bottom-up approach is essential to ensure sustainability science progresses, even amid shifting political processes that threaten international collaboration and funding. Locally driven solutions that value diverse perspectives and knowledge systems are vital for resilience. By supporting community-led action, sharing ideas across regions, and recognising that sustainability means different things in different places, we can build a more flexible, inclusive, and resilient path toward achieving the Sustainable Development Goals in an uncertain world. Technical summary Recent geopolitical events provide a stark reminder of the need to build a resilient, global approach to sustainability science. Centralised, top-down models of sustainability science are likely to be vulnerable to disruptions, from pandemics to wars, that threaten progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals and jeopardise decades of collaborative advancement that are needed to support future progress. We argue that a decentralised, community-empowered model provides the foundation needed for a resilient sustainability scientific effort. By prioritising local solutions, embracing diverse knowledge systems, and fostering horizontal knowledge exchange, we can create a more resilient and adaptable framework. Sustainability science initiatives need to elevate successful local initiatives, adopt transdisciplinary approaches that include underrepresented knowledge holders, build decentralised knowledge-sharing networks, and recognise that sustainability has different meanings across cultural and geographical contexts. Social media summary Decentralised sustainability science: local, diverse, and resilient in a fractious and unpredictable world.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Sustainability
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2025.10037
Primary Topic
Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deglobalisation? The case for diversified and decentralised global sustainability science

L. Pendleton, Giles B. Sioen, V. S. Semeena, Cornelia B. Krug et al.
Global Sustainability
Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
article

Deglobalisation? The case for diversified and decentralised global sustainability science

L. Pendleton, Giles B. Sioen, V. S. Semeena, Cornelia B. Krug, Zeenat Niazi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Non-technical summary Recent geopolitical events remind us of the need for a resilient, global approach to sustainability science. This Commentary argues that a diverse, bottom-up approach is essential to ensure sustainability science progresses, even amid shifting political processes that threaten international collaboration and funding. Locally driven solutions that value diverse perspectives and knowledge systems are vital for resilience. By supporting community-led action, sharing ideas across regions, and recognising that sustainability means different things in different places, we can build a more flexible, inclusive, and resilient path toward achieving the Sustainable Development Goals in an uncertain world. Technical summary Recent geopolitical events provide a stark reminder of the need to build a resilient, global approach to sustainability science. Centralised, top-down models of sustainability science are likely to be vulnerable to disruptions, from pandemics to wars, that threaten progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals and jeopardise decades of collaborative advancement that are needed to support future progress. We argue that a decentralised, community-empowered model provides the foundation needed for a resilient sustainability scientific effort. By prioritising local solutions, embracing diverse knowledge systems, and fostering horizontal knowledge exchange, we can create a more resilient and adaptable framework. Sustainability science initiatives need to elevate successful local initiatives, adopt transdisciplinary approaches that include underrepresented knowledge holders, build decentralised knowledge-sharing networks, and recognise that sustainability has different meanings across cultural and geographical contexts. Social media summary Decentralised sustainability science: local, diverse, and resilient in a fractious and unpredictable world.

Global SustainabilityVol. 8
Energy and Resources Institute (IN), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Ifremer (FR), Université de Bretagne Occidentale (FR), University of Zurich (CH), Senckenberg - Leibniz Institution for Biodiversity and Earth System Research (DE), UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB), Future Earth (CA), Institut Universitaire Européen de la Mer (FR), The University of Tokyo (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.