Patriarchal securitization: epistemic domination in the politics of European agriculture

This article examines how the securitization of food production in the European Union (EU) reinforces patriarchal authority and epistemic exclusion. Building on feminist security studies, it analyzes how discourses of ‘food security’ elevate masculinized figures of authority–farmers cast as protectors and providers–while marginalizing alternative knowledges of care, sustainability, and glob al justice. The study applies frame analysis to debates following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, focusing on two key controversies: proposals to reduce pesticide use under the Farm to Fork strategy and the Nature Restoration Law. The empirical material consists of statements, press releases, and media interventions by Copa-Cogeca, the Federation of Swedish Farmers, and allied politicians in the European Parliament. Agricultural lobby groups framed these initiatives as threats to Europe’s survival, invoking militarized imagery and claiming epistemic authority to ‘shoot down’ environmental regulation in the name of national defence. The paper contributes to feminist debates on epistemic justice by demonstrating how securitization both depoliticizes contested issues and sustains patriarchal and Eurocentric authority over what counts as credible knowledge in food politics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Gender Studies
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2025.2581200
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Security and Public Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patriarchal securitization: epistemic domination in the politics of European agriculture

Markus Holdo
1 citations
Journal of Gender Studies
Global Security and Public Health
4.20
article

Patriarchal securitization: epistemic domination in the politics of European agriculture

Markus Holdo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article examines how the securitization of food production in the European Union (EU) reinforces patriarchal authority and epistemic exclusion. Building on feminist security studies, it analyzes how discourses of ‘food security’ elevate masculinized figures of authority–farmers cast as protectors and providers–while marginalizing alternative knowledges of care, sustainability, and glob al justice. The study applies frame analysis to debates following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, focusing on two key controversies: proposals to reduce pesticide use under the Farm to Fork strategy and the Nature Restoration Law. The empirical material consists of statements, press releases, and media interventions by Copa-Cogeca, the Federation of Swedish Farmers, and allied politicians in the European Parliament. Agricultural lobby groups framed these initiatives as threats to Europe’s survival, invoking militarized imagery and claiming epistemic authority to ‘shoot down’ environmental regulation in the name of national defence. The paper contributes to feminist debates on epistemic justice by demonstrating how securitization both depoliticizes contested issues and sustains patriarchal and Eurocentric authority over what counts as credible knowledge in food politics.

Journal of Gender Studies
Lund University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Global Security and Public Health
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Patriarchal securitization: epistemic domination in the politics of European agriculture — Markus Holdo · Journal of Gender Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS