Intimacy Double Bind: The Labor Women Workers Put Into Their Supervisors

Why do workers appear to participate in their own exploitation? In this paper, I focus on the relationship that India’s women community health workers—called ASHAs (Accredited Social Health activists)—have with their nurse supervisors, also women. ASHAs represent India’s gendered development paradigm in a case of what scholars call the “feminization of responsibility.” Although they are a large and important workforce, the Indian state insists ASHAs are not workers but “paid volunteers.” Using 14 months of ethnographic fieldwork, including 80 interviews, I show that this makes ASHAs excessively reliant on their supervisors, creating what I call an “intimacy double bind”: a no-win dynamic in which ASHAs must perform intimacy with their supervisors even though it comes at material and emotional cost to them. Although all ASHAs are subject to it, I show how the intimacy double bind impacts different ASHAs differently. My findings demonstrate how insecure conditions of work—here a result of the partial commodification of women’s care work—can produce feudalistic relations between classes of workers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gender & Society
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432251387710
Primary Topic
Emotional Labor in Professions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intimacy Double Bind: The Labor Women Workers Put Into Their Supervisors

Vrinda Marwah
Gender & Society
Emotional Labor in Professions
article

Intimacy Double Bind: The Labor Women Workers Put Into Their Supervisors

Vrinda Marwah
article en

Abstract

Why do workers appear to participate in their own exploitation? In this paper, I focus on the relationship that India’s women community health workers—called ASHAs (Accredited Social Health activists)—have with their nurse supervisors, also women. ASHAs represent India’s gendered development paradigm in a case of what scholars call the “feminization of responsibility.” Although they are a large and important workforce, the Indian state insists ASHAs are not workers but “paid volunteers.” Using 14 months of ethnographic fieldwork, including 80 interviews, I show that this makes ASHAs excessively reliant on their supervisors, creating what I call an “intimacy double bind”: a no-win dynamic in which ASHAs must perform intimacy with their supervisors even though it comes at material and emotional cost to them. Although all ASHAs are subject to it, I show how the intimacy double bind impacts different ASHAs differently. My findings demonstrate how insecure conditions of work—here a result of the partial commodification of women’s care work—can produce feudalistic relations between classes of workers.

Gender & SocietyVol. 39(6)
University of South Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Emotional Labor in Professions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Intimacy Double Bind: The Labor Women Workers Put Into Their Supervisors — Vrinda Marwah · Gender & Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS