Not just ‘super‐predators': human behaviour shapes wildlife behavioural responses across avoidance, tolerance and attraction

Humans are thought to have a disproportionately negative impact on wildlife and are viewed by some as the ultimate ‘super predator'. This view implies that wild animals perceive humans primarily as predators. However, a growing body of evidence shows that wildlife can have remarkable tolerance for, or even attraction to, humans. Here, we present wildlife responses to humans along the avoidance–attraction continuum, to highlight that avoidance, tolerance, and attraction are all within the normal range of wildlife behavioural responses to humans. We embed the avoidance–attraction continuum in a mechanistic framework to understand behavioural responses to humans as the result of a species' evolutionary history and accumulated experiences during their lives. We find that historical and current human behaviour towards wildlife – whether it is aversive, neutral or beneficial to animals – plays an important role in shaping selective pressures and learning outcomes in the focal population. By shifting from a restrictive view of wildlife as inherently fearful of humans to a broader understanding of wildlife responses, we are better able to refine public perception of wildlife behaviour, wildlife management and ecological research, and ultimately promote human–wildlife coexistence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oikos
Published
2025-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/oik.11413
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Not just ‘super‐predators': human behaviour shapes wildlife behavioural responses across avoidance, tolerance and attraction

Manisha Bhardwaj, Sebastian Schwegmann, Friederike Zenth, Daniel T. Blumstein et al.
1 citations
Oikos
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.72
article

Not just ‘super‐predators': human behaviour shapes wildlife behavioural responses across avoidance, tolerance and attraction

Manisha Bhardwaj, Sebastian Schwegmann, Friederike Zenth, Daniel T. Blumstein, Ilse Storch, Luca Corlatti, Farina Sooth, Mengxi Kou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Humans are thought to have a disproportionately negative impact on wildlife and are viewed by some as the ultimate ‘super predator'. This view implies that wild animals perceive humans primarily as predators. However, a growing body of evidence shows that wildlife can have remarkable tolerance for, or even attraction to, humans. Here, we present wildlife responses to humans along the avoidance–attraction continuum, to highlight that avoidance, tolerance, and attraction are all within the normal range of wildlife behavioural responses to humans. We embed the avoidance–attraction continuum in a mechanistic framework to understand behavioural responses to humans as the result of a species' evolutionary history and accumulated experiences during their lives. We find that historical and current human behaviour towards wildlife – whether it is aversive, neutral or beneficial to animals – plays an important role in shaping selective pressures and learning outcomes in the focal population. By shifting from a restrictive view of wildlife as inherently fearful of humans to a broader understanding of wildlife responses, we are better able to refine public perception of wildlife behaviour, wildlife management and ecological research, and ultimately promote human–wildlife coexistence.

OikosVol. 2026(3)
University of California, Los Angeles (US), Parco Nazionale d'Abruzzo (IT), Oeko Institut (DE), Rachel Carson Center for Environment and Society (DE), Evolutionary Genomics (United States) (US), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.