Instrument uncertainties of network-suitable ground-based microwave radiometers: overview, quantification, and mitigation strategies

Abstract. To enhance observations of the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL), the European Meteorological Network (EUMETNET), and the Aerosol, Clouds, and Trace Gases Research Infrastructure (ACTRIS) are currently collaborating to establish networks of microwave radiometers (MWRs). MWRs can be used to derive thermodynamic profiles within the ABL. Understanding and assessing instrument uncertainties of state-of-the-art MWRs are therefore crucial for accurate observations and also data assimilation purposes. Some national weather services are currently exploring the potential of MWR networks to improve short-term weather forecasts. In this paper, we discuss uncertainties inherent to the MWR instrument itself, namely (1) radiometric noise, (2) long-term drifts and jumps, (3) calibration repeatability, (4) biases/systematic differences between instruments, and (5) radome degradation. These uncertainties are expressed in brightness temperatures. For state-of-the-art MWRs (here, the Generation 5 Humidity and Temperature Profiler, HATPRO-Gen5), radiometric noise at ambient temperatures is a maximum of 0.32 K in the V-band but usually lower, especially near cold load temperature ranges in the K-band (≤0.11 K). Long-term drifts or jumps between calibrations, which are at least 2 months apart, are usually below 0.4 K in the K-band and 1.0 K in the V-band but can also be higher. Drifts do not follow a discernable timely pattern and are therefore not easily quantifiable in a meaningful way. Calibrating at least every 6 months is thus advised. Calibration repeatability is shown to be well under 0.16 K. Mean brightness temperature differences between two HATPRO-Gen5 instruments are shown to be as high as 0.15 K in the K-band and 0.58 K in the V-band in the zenith viewing direction. The radome has significantly degraded due to weathering and needs to be replaced if, 10 min after a rain event, residual water on its surface still causes a temperature deviation of more than 2 K, compared with a dry radome.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Published
2025-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-6251-2025
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Instrument uncertainties of network-suitable ground-based microwave radiometers: overview, quantification, and mitigation strategies

Ulrich Löhnert, Tobias Böck, Tobias Marke, Christine Knist et al.
2 citations
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
2.60
article

Instrument uncertainties of network-suitable ground-based microwave radiometers: overview, quantification, and mitigation strategies

Ulrich Löhnert, Tobias Böck, Tobias Marke, Christine Knist, Bernhard Pospichal, Moritz Löffler
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract. To enhance observations of the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL), the European Meteorological Network (EUMETNET), and the Aerosol, Clouds, and Trace Gases Research Infrastructure (ACTRIS) are currently collaborating to establish networks of microwave radiometers (MWRs). MWRs can be used to derive thermodynamic profiles within the ABL. Understanding and assessing instrument uncertainties of state-of-the-art MWRs are therefore crucial for accurate observations and also data assimilation purposes. Some national weather services are currently exploring the potential of MWR networks to improve short-term weather forecasts. In this paper, we discuss uncertainties inherent to the MWR instrument itself, namely (1) radiometric noise, (2) long-term drifts and jumps, (3) calibration repeatability, (4) biases/systematic differences between instruments, and (5) radome degradation. These uncertainties are expressed in brightness temperatures. For state-of-the-art MWRs (here, the Generation 5 Humidity and Temperature Profiler, HATPRO-Gen5), radiometric noise at ambient temperatures is a maximum of 0.32 K in the V-band but usually lower, especially near cold load temperature ranges in the K-band (≤0.11 K). Long-term drifts or jumps between calibrations, which are at least 2 months apart, are usually below 0.4 K in the K-band and 1.0 K in the V-band but can also be higher. Drifts do not follow a discernable timely pattern and are therefore not easily quantifiable in a meaningful way. Calibrating at least every 6 months is thus advised. Calibration repeatability is shown to be well under 0.16 K. Mean brightness temperature differences between two HATPRO-Gen5 instruments are shown to be as high as 0.15 K in the K-band and 0.58 K in the V-band in the zenith viewing direction. The radome has significantly degraded due to weathering and needs to be replaced if, 10 min after a rain event, residual water on its surface still causes a temperature deviation of more than 2 K, compared with a dry radome.

Atmospheric measurement techniquesVol. 18(21)
Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE), Deutscher Wetterdienst (DE), University of Cologne (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
2.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.